We investigated whether Peace4Tarpon's trauma-responsive community capacity activities led to greater collaboration among community partners. We conducted longitudinal social network analysis (SNA) among organizations within Peace4Tarpon's network in 2016 and 2018 to capture cooperation around adverse childhood experiences-related topics. We examined network structure, cohesion, organizational collaboration, and associations between centrality and organizational practices. Peace4Tarpon's network included diverse sectors, with a group of organizations forming the network core and collaborating over time. The network displayed a small increase in cohesion, more cross-sector collaboration, and less heterophily over time. We found a significant difference between the mean betweenness centralities of organizations who assessed resilience and those who did not in the 2018 average union network. This is one of the first studies using SNA to investigate a trauma-informed community network. Findings from this type of analysis may assist community organizations in strengthening outreach and strategically engaging organizations within a trauma-informed network.

中文翻译：

---

创伤知情社区的组织伙伴关系：社区范围的社交网络研究

我们调查了 Peace4Tarpon 的创伤响应社区能力活动是否导致社区伙伴之间更大的合作。我们在 2016 年和 2018 年在 Peace4Tarpon 网络内的组织之间进行了纵向社交网络分析 (SNA)，以捕捉围绕不良童年经历相关主题的合作。我们研究了网络结构、凝聚力、组织协作以及中心性与组织实践之间的关联。Peace4Tarpon 的网络包括不同的部门，由一组组织构成网络核心并随着时间的推移进行协作。随着时间的推移，网络的凝聚力略有增加，跨部门合作更多，异质性减少。我们发现在 2018 年平均工会网络中评估弹性的组织的平均中介中心性与未评估的组织之间存在显着差异。这是使用 SNA 调查创伤知情社区网络的首批研究之一。此类分析的结果可能有助于社区组织在创伤知情网络内加强外展和战略性参与组织。