Sport clubs are considered an ideal setting for the social integration of people with a migration background. However, they can also be a place of social closure practices, where assimilative ideas and ethnic boundaries are present. Besides the individual characteristics of the members, adequate club organizational structures are relevant for preventing social closure and facilitating social integration. Thus, the role of organizational structures for social integration might differ between natives and people with a migration background. Based on data from 42 Swiss sport clubs and 780 sport club members, with and without a migration background, we analyzed individual (migration background and membership biography) and structural factors (situational, club goals, and club culture) using multilevel models and tested cross-level interactions between structural variables and migration background. The results reveal that membership biography (e.g. membership duration and volunteering) and migration background are relevant for social integration. The estimated cross-level effects reveal that, unlike for natives and second-generation people with a migration background, structural conditions are especially relevant for first-generation people with a migration background. For example, social integration increases with a higher proportion of people with a migration background in the club or a less assimilative club culture.

体育俱乐部被认为是具有移民背景的人融入社会的理想场所。然而，它们也可能是社会封闭实践的地方，存在同化思想和种族界限。除了成员的个人特征外，适当的俱乐部组织结构与防止社会封闭和促进社会融合有关。因此，组织结构在社会融合方面的作用可能因当地人和有移民背景的人而异。根据来自 42 个瑞士体育俱乐部和 780 名体育俱乐部成员的数据，无论是否有移民背景，我们分析了个人（移民背景和会员履历）和结构性因素（情境、俱乐部目标、和俱乐部文化）使用多层次模型并测试结构变量和移民背景之间的跨层次相互作用。结果表明，会员履历（例如会员期限和志愿服务）和移民背景与社会融合相关。估计的跨层次效应表明，与具有移民背景的本地人和第二代人不同，结构条件与具有移民背景的第一代人特别相关。例如，社会融合随着俱乐部中具有移民背景或较少同化的俱乐部文化的人比例增加而增加。会员资格期限和志愿服务）和移民背景与社会融合相关。估计的跨层次效应表明，与具有移民背景的本地人和第二代人不同，结构条件与具有移民背景的第一代人特别相关。例如，社会融合随着俱乐部中具有移民背景或较少同化的俱乐部文化的人比例增加而增加。会员资格期限和志愿服务）和移民背景与社会融合相关。估计的跨层次效应表明，与具有移民背景的本地人和第二代人不同，结构条件与具有移民背景的第一代人特别相关。例如，社会融合随着俱乐部中具有移民背景或较少同化的俱乐部文化的人比例增加而增加。