The aim of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale (BWAS-T). The study sample comprised 448 participants (279 females and 169 males) who completed a survey including the BWAS-T, Workaholism Battery (WorkBAT), Dutch Work Addiction Scale (DUWAS), and Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS). The Turkish version of BWAS had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .76). As expected, score on the BWAS-T was positively correlated with scores on the Drive subscale of the WorkBAT and Working Excessively and Working Compulsively subscales of the DUWAS. No relationship was found between the BWAS-T and Work Enjoyment subscale of the WorkBAT. Regarding concurrent validity, scores on the BWAS-T were strongly correlated with those on the DASS and its subscales. The factor structure of the BWAS-T was also tested using confirmatory factor analysis which found support for the original unidimensional factor structure. Results demonstrated that the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the BWAS were robust. Limitations and recommendations for further studies are discussed.

本研究的目的是检查土耳其版卑尔根工作成瘾量表 (BWAS-T) 的心理测量特性。研究样本包括 448 名参与者（279 名女性和 169 名男性），他们完成了一项调查，包括 BWAS-T、工作狂电池 (WorkBAT)、荷兰工作成瘾量表 (DUWAS) 和抑郁焦虑压力量表 (DASS)。BWAS 的土耳其语版本具有良好的内部一致性（Cronbach's α = .76）。正如预期的那样，BWAS-T 的分数与 WorkBAT 的 Drive 分量表以及 DUWAS 的过度工作和强迫工作分量表的分数呈正相关。在 BWAS-T 和 WorkBAT 的工作享受分量表之间没有发现任何关系。关于同时效度，BWAS-T 的分数与 DASS 及其分量表的分数密切相关。BWAS-T 的因子结构也使用验证性因子分析进行了测试，该分析发现对原始单维因子结构的支持。结果表明，土耳其语版 BWAS 的信度和效度是稳健的。讨论了进一步研究的局限性和建议。