This paper presents an integrated infrastructure-policy framework to analyze policy attention on addressing road infrastructure network vulnerability in terms of accessing critical facilities in the aftermath of a flood. Coping with network vulnerability, particularly physical access to various critical facilities and the services they provide, is an essential step in achieving a resilient community. However, the extent to which the network of local plans addresses such vulnerability remains unclear. To bridge this gap, this paper uses the Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard method to examine the infrastructure-related policy attention in relation to community vulnerability vis-a-vis disrupted access to critical facilities. The proposed framework is tested in a set of super neighborhoods in Houston, Texas. Findings reveal a discrepancy between the policy effort and network vulnerability and identifies strengths and weaknesses of various plans in addressing disrupted access to critical facilities. The framework introduced in this paper provides a tool for stakeholders to evaluate an existing network of plans and identify gaps for future resilience improvement.

本文提出了一个综合的基础设施政策框架，以分析政策对解决道路基础设施网络脆弱性方面的政策关注，即在洪水过后访问关键设施。应对网络脆弱性，尤其是对各种关键设施及其提供的服务的物理访问，是实现弹性社区的重要一步。然而，地方计划网络解决此类脆弱性的程度仍不清楚。为了弥合这一差距，本文使用了弹性计分卡的计划整合方法来检查与社区脆弱性相关的基础设施相关政策关注与关键设施的中断访问有关。提议的框架在德克萨斯州休斯顿的一组超级社区中进行了测试。调查结果揭示了政策努力与网络脆弱性之间的差异，并确定了各种计划在解决关键设施中断访问方面的优势和劣势。本文中介绍的框架为利益相关者提供了一种工具来评估现有的计划网络并确定未来弹性改进的差距。