当前位置: X-MOL 学术Research in Phenomenology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Faute de frappe: Derrida’s Typos
Research in Phenomenology Pub Date : 2021-04-08 , DOI: 10.1163/15691640-12341464
Katie Chenoweth 1
Affiliation  

“I type very quickly, very badly, with many errors [fautes],” Jacques Derrida confessed in a late interview. This paper proposes that the typographical error – usually viewed as a mere “accident” – may in fact be understood as a productive site for deconstructive reading and thought. Drawing on Nietzsche’s suggestion that the typewriter acts as a “collaborator” in thinking, this paper examines Derrida’s use of the typewriter, with particular attention to his typos. Following Derrida’s reading in the Geschlecht series and his own typographical practice, this paper argues that the typo should be thought of as the condition of possibility of every type – and as a defining difference between Derrida and Heidegger.



中文翻译:

Faute de frappe:德里达的错别字

“我打字非常快,非常糟糕,有很多错误 [ fautes ],”雅克德里达在晚些时候的采访中承认。本文提出,排版错误——通常被视为纯粹的“意外”——实际上可以被理解为解构性阅读和思考的生产场所。借鉴尼采关于打字机在思维中充当“合作者”的建议,本文考察了德里达对打字机的使用,特别关注他的错别字。根据德里达在Geschlecht系列中的阅读和他自己的排版实践,本文认为应该将错字视为每种类型可能性的条件——以及德里达和海德格尔之间的决定性差异。

更新日期:2021-04-08
down
wechat
bug