Many types of items are used to measure self-reported cognition, resulting in heterogeneity across studies. Certain cognitive self-report measure types may be more predictive of future decline. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to compare whether specific types of cognitive self-report measures better predict risk for cognitive decline over time when measures are directly compared within the same study. The PRISMA criteria guided the review. Eligibility criteria included: longitudinal studies, outcome of cognitive decline, at least 2 different cognitive self-report measures, and no cognitive impairment at baseline. Nineteen studies were included in the final review. A narrative synthesis of results was completed, resulting in 3 thematic groups of comparisons across self-reported measure types. Self-reported memory decline with worry and peer perceptions of memory were associated with the highest risk for cognitive decline. Future longitudinal investigations of self-reported cognitive problems should focus on using measures that may be most sensitive to predicting cognitive decline risk.

许多类型的项目用于测量自我报告的认知，导致研究之间存在异质性。某些认知自我报告测量类型可能更能预测未来的衰退。因此，本系统评价的目的是比较在同一研究中直接比较测量值时，特定类型的认知自我报告测量是否可以更好地预测随着时间的推移认知能力下降的风险。PRISMA 标准指导了审查。资格标准包括：纵向研究、认知能力下降的结果、至少 2 种不同的认知自我报告测量以及基线时无认知障碍。最终审查中纳入了十九项研究。结果的叙述性综合已完成，形成了 3 个主题组，对自我报告的测量类型进行了比较。自我报告的因忧虑而导致的记忆力下降以及同伴对记忆力的看法与认知能力下降的最高风险相关。未来对自我报告的认知问题的纵向调查应侧重于使用对预测认知下降风险最敏感的措施。