Objective:

To first validate the diagnostic accuracy of the “Triana Test,” a new story recall test based on emotional material.

Method:

A phase I study of validation. We included 55 patients with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and 69 healthy controls, diagnosed according to the “Memory Associative Test of the district of Seine-Saint-Denis” (TMA-93), and matched by age, gender, and educational level. The Triana Test’s diagnostic accuracy was calculated by ROC curve analysis and Spearman correlations estimated its convergent validity with a hippocampal memory test, the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall (FCSRT+IR).

Results:

The “Triana Test” immediate and delayed recalls showed adequate diagnostic accuracy (AUC ≥ 0,74). The delayed free recall showed the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.86). Correlations with the FCSRT+IR were moderate to strong.

Conclusions:

The “Triana Test” demonstrated accuracy for discriminating amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment patients from healthy controls and convergent validity with the FCSRT+IR.

中文翻译：

---

Triana测试的初步验证：基于情感材料的新故事回忆测试

客观的：

首先验证“Triana 测试”的诊断准确性，这是一种基于情感材料的新故事回忆测试。

方法：

第一阶段的验证研究。我们纳入了 55 名遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者和 69 名健康对照，根据“塞纳-圣但尼地区记忆联想测验”（TMA-93）诊断，并按年龄、性别和教育水平进行匹配。Triana 测试的诊断准确性通过 ROC 曲线分析计算，Spearman 相关性通过海马记忆测试、即时回忆的自由和提示选择性提醒测试 (FCSRT+IR) 估计其收敛有效性。

结果：

“Triana 测试”立即和延迟召回显示出足够的诊断准确性（AUC ≥ 0.74）。延迟自由召回显示出最高的诊断准确性（AUC = 0.86）。与 FCSRT+IR 的相关性为中到强。

结论：

“Triana 测试”证明了区分健忘型轻度认知障碍患者与健康对照的准确性以及 FCSRT+IR 的收敛效度。