Abstract

Repeated reading (RR) is an established and extensively researched intervention which has been shown to improve reading fluency and comprehension. However, past reviews have found the rigor of the RR research insufficient for it to be considered evidence-based. Previous review of the RR research were updated and expanded. Forty-four group designs and 63 SCD studies were evaluated using criteria proposed in the literature. Four group designs and four SCD studies met criteria for high-quality or acceptable research. RR can be considered a promising practice based on group design research; it cannot be considered an evidence-based practice based on SCD research. Additional rigorous research is needed on RR, and criteria used to evaluate rigor should be considered.

摘要

重复阅读 (RR) 是一项成熟且经过广泛研究的干预措施，已被证明可以提高阅读流畅度和理解能力。然而，过去的审查发现 RR 研究的严谨性不足以将其视为基于证据的。先前对 RR 研究的审查已更新和扩展。使用文献中提出的标准对 44 组设计和 63 项 SCD 研究进行了评估。四组设计和四项 SCD 研究符合高质量或可接受的研究标准。RR 可以被认为是一种基于群体设计研究的有前途的实践；它不能被视为基于 SCD 研究的循证实践。需要对 RR 进行额外的严格研究，并应考虑用于评估严格性的标准。