This article examines the significance of the private-public exchange of letters between Gershom Scholem and Hannah Arendt in the wake of the Eichmann trial. Using rhetorical analysis, it considers the respective arguments concerning Jewish responsibility, the incompatible political-moral frameworks offered to underpin such judgments, and the extreme identities the correspondents construct for each other. In doing so, it identifies the ultimate significance of the exchange with the total breakdown of discourse it symbolically resulted in—in other words, with the consensus pertaining to the Holocaust leading to a complete incommensurability of the respective political-moral positions. Such a state of affairs is finally accounted for, paradoxically, in terms of the far-reaching agreement between Arendt and Scholem, reaching beyond politics and even identity: the total inescapability of Jewishness.

中文翻译：

---

话语的分解：大屠杀后的犹太人身份和舒勒姆-阿伦特交流

本文探讨了在艾希曼审判之后 Gershom Scholem 和 Hannah Arendt 之间私下-公开信件交换的重要性。使用修辞分析，它考虑了有关犹太人责任的各自论点、支持此类判断的不相容的政治道德框架，以及通讯者为彼此构建的极端身份。在这样做时，它将交流的最终意义与它象征性地导致的话语彻底崩溃——换言之，与大屠杀有关的共识导致了各自政治道德立场的完全不可通约。矛盾的是，这种事态最终被解释为阿伦特和舒勒姆之间影响深远的协议，