abstract:This case study discusses an assessment project in which a rubric was used to evaluate information literacy (IL) skills as reflected in undergraduate students' research papers. Subsequent analysis sought relationships between the students' IL skills and their contact with the library through various channels. The project proved far longer and more complex than expected and yielded inconclusive results. We reflect on what went wrong and highlight lessons learned in the process. Special attention is paid to issues of project management and statistical analysis, which proved crucial stumbling blocks in the effort to conduct a meaningful authentic assessment.

中文翻译：

---

真实评估之路上的坑洼和陷阱

摘要：本案例研究讨论了一个评估项目，其中使用量规来评估本科生研究论文中反映的信息素养 (IL) 技能。随后的分析寻求学生的 IL 技能与他们通过各种渠道与图书馆的联系之间的关系。事实证明，该项目比预期的时间更长、更复杂，并产生了不确定的结果。我们反思出了什么问题，并强调在这个过程中吸取的教训。特别关注项目管理和统计分析问题，这些问题被证明是进行有意义的真实评估的关键绊脚石。