Abstract:The 1728 Musin Rebellion, an attempt to overthrow King Yŏngjo, erupted out of intense court factionalism. Over 1000 rebels were investigated and punished by Yŏngjo's special tribunal. This article examines a hitherto neglected area: the punishments meted out to four of the most prominent leaders of the 1728 Musin Rebellion. Historians have focused on the causes of the rebellion rather than on its suppression, seeing rebellion as a thermometer of social problems. However, the diversity of rebel punishments requires some analysis: one was granted an "honorable" death, while another had his liver cut out and eaten, two received no trial and officials attempted to build a swamp to replace one rebel's home. An analysis of official trial records as well as private, legal, and cultural histories show that the court's punishments were initially motivated by strategic needs to destroy the rebel challenge. In addition, officials saw punishment as an extension of factional conflict, a course Yŏngjo was keen to discourage and he used punishments as a tool to solidify his political domination and pacify the post-rebellion court.

中文翻译：

---

1728年穆辛叛乱领导人的惩罚

摘要：1728 年穆辛叛乱，企图推翻 Yŏngjo 国王，爆发于强烈的宫廷派系主义。Yŏngjo 的特别法庭调查并惩罚了 1000 多名叛乱分子。本文考察了一个迄今为止被忽视的领域：对 1728 年穆辛叛乱的四位最杰出领导人的惩罚。历史学家关注叛乱的原因而不是镇压，将叛乱视为社会问题的温度计。然而，造反者惩罚的多样性需要一些分析：一个被授予“光荣”的死亡，而另一个被切掉肝脏并被吃掉，两个没有受到审判，官员们试图建造一个沼泽来取代一个造反者的家。对官方审判记录以及私人、法律和文化历史的分析表明，法院“ s 的惩罚最初是出于摧毁叛军挑战的战略需要。此外，官员们将惩罚视为派系冲突的延伸，Yŏngjo 热衷于劝阻这一过程，他利用惩罚作为巩固他的政治统治和安抚叛乱后法庭的工具。