当前位置: X-MOL 学术Int. Data Priv. Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Opinions can be incorrect (in our opinion)! On data protection law’s accuracy principle
International Data Privacy Law ( IF 2.500 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-29 , DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipz025
Dara Hallinan , Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius 1
Affiliation  

- The GDPR contains an accuracy principle, as most data privacy laws in the world do. In principle, data controllers must ensure that personal data they use are accurate. - Some have argued that the accuracy principle does not apply to personal data in the form of opinions about data subjects. - We argue, however, from a positive law perspective, that the accuracy principle does apply to opinions. - We further argue, from a normative perspective, that the accuracy principle should apply to opinions.

中文翻译:

意见可能不正确(在我们看来)!论数据保护法的准确性原则

- GDPR 包含准确性原则,就像世界上大多数数据隐私法一样。原则上,数据控制者必须确保他们使用的个人数据准确无误。- 一些人认为,准确性原则不适用于以关于数据主体的意见形式存在的个人数据。- 然而,我们认为,从实证法的角度来看,准确性原则确实适用于意见。- 我们进一步认为,从规范的角度来看,准确性原则应该适用于意见。
更新日期:2020-01-29
down
wechat
bug