当前位置: X-MOL 学术Open Theology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Neither Philosophy nor Theology: The Origin in Heidegger’s Earliest Thought
Open Theology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 , DOI: 10.1515/opth-2020-0159
Erik Kuravsky 1
Affiliation  

“The Origin,” one of Martin Heidegger’s most important notions after 1934, is tightly related to being-historical thinking, and to the peculiar kind of divinity that being-historical thinking indicates. However, the notion of the Origin appears already in Heidegger’s early Freiburg lectures (given between 1919 and 1923), thus placing it among the fundamentals of his early thought. This article argues that Heidegger’s project of fundamental ontology emerges from that early notion of the Origin, preparing the way for its flourishing in his later thinking. Attending to Heidegger’s early notion of the Origin, I suggest, reveals a unique feature of Heidegger’s thinking; namely, an element of genuine religiosity ungraspable in terms of both philosophy and theology. Thus, rather than interpreting fundamental ontology as a transcendental project encompassing a de-theologized version of early Christianity, it should be taken as an attempt to think the truth of the Origin, thus preparing the way for the genuine religiosity of Heidegger’s later thought. In this light, a unique sense of divinity underlies Heidegger’s lectures between 1919 and 1925; a sense which can only be comprehended through Heidegger’s triple sense schema (enactment–relation–content).

中文翻译:

无论是哲学还是神学:海德格尔最早思想的起源

“起源”是马丁·海德格尔 1934 年之后最重要的概念之一,它与存在-历史思维以及存在-历史思维所表明的那种特殊的神性密切相关。然而,起源的概念已经出现在海德格尔早期的弗莱堡演讲中(1919 年至 1923 年间),从而将其置于他早期思想的基础之中。本文认为,海德格尔的基本本体论计划源于早期的起源观念,为它在后来的思想中的蓬勃发展铺平了道路。我认为,关注海德格尔早期的起源概念,揭示了海德格尔思想的一个独特特征;即,在哲学和神学方面都无法把握的真正的宗教信仰元素。因此,与其将基本本体论解释为包含早期基督教去神化版本的先验计划,不如将其视为对起源真理的思考,从而为海德格尔后期思想的真正宗教信仰铺平道路。有鉴于此,海德格尔在 1919 至 1925 年间的演讲中蕴含着一种独特的神性。一种只能通过海德格尔的三重意义模式(制定-关系-内容)来理解的意义。
更新日期:2021-01-01
down
wechat
bug