This paper investigates the pre-history of Nicolò Leoniceno's De tribus doctrinis ordinatis secundum Galeni sententiam (1508). It has been often maintained that Leoniceno's treatise broke with scholastic interpretations of Galen's prologue to the Art of Medicine by turning away from interpretations in terms of scientific method towards a didactic interpretation. This paper questions this common view by offering an in-depth analysis of a major, early-14th-century interpretation of Galen's prologue, Pietro Torrigiano's Plusquam commentum. I argue that Torrigiano read Galen's prologue as a didactic text, interpreting it in terms of demonstrative syllogisms, because he assumed that logic, and demonstrative syllogisms, have a didactic function. This suggests that this common understanding of Leoniceno's treatise is incorrect: Leoniceno did not break with scholastic interpretations by turning away from scientific method towards didactics, but by replacing previous didactic interpretations of Galen's prologue in terms of scholastic logic with an alternative didactic interpretation.

中文翻译：

---

重温盖伦在列奥尼切诺之前的医学艺术序言的释经传统：Pietro Torrigiano 的 Plusquam 评论中的逻辑、​​教学和教学法

本文研究了 Nicolò Leoniceno 的 De tribus doctrinis ordinatis secundum Galeni sententiam (1508) 的史前史。人们常常认为，列奥尼切诺的论文与对盖伦的《医学艺术》序言的学术解释决裂，从科学方法方面的解释转向说教式解释。本文通过深入分析 14 世纪早期对盖伦序言 Pietro Torrigiano 的 Plusquam 评论的主要解释来质疑这一普遍观点。我认为托里贾诺将盖伦的序言读作教学文本，用论证三段论来解释它，因为他假设逻辑和论证三段论具有教学功能。这表明对列奥尼切诺论文的这种普遍理解是不正确的：