当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ecol. Indic. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study
Ecological Indicators ( IF 6.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-11 , DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107883
Aurélie Cardona , Marc Tchamitchian , Servane Penvern , Arnaud Dufils , Stine Kramer Jacobsen , Maren Korsgaard , Mario Porcel , Weronika Świergiel , Marco Tasin , François Warlop , Lene Sigsgaard

The role of functional biodiversity for favouring natural regulation and reducing pesticide use in fruit production is generally acknowledged. Although a number of farmers attempt to favour biodiversity through different strategies (e.g. diversified hedges, nesting boxes), they often lack means to evaluate how their actions contribute in practice to functional biodiversity. We assumed here that to create useful and appropriate monitoring methods, it is necessary to take into account the variety of knowledge, perceptions and interests about functional biodiversity. To test our hypothesis, we adopted a comprehensive and participative approach based on interviews and workshops with farmers, advisors and field agronomists involved in apple orchard management. Our objective was to understand their different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity and then, to design monitoring methods adapted to those perceptions and pre-existing uses.

Our findings revealed both a plurality of perceptions of functional biodiversity along with a diversity of objectives and uses of monitoring methods. Based on these results, we identified four main attitudes towards the management of functional biodiversity: the wait-and-see attitude, the naturalist attitude, the regulation attitude and the multifunctional attitude. These attitudes do not correspond to person’s profiles, since one person can adopt different attitudes in regard to different biodiversity components or in regard to the different practices supporting biodiversity. In addition, attitudes can vary over time. The identification of these attitudes allowed us to design, with the workshops’ participants, a guiding framework to create monitoring programs (i.e. combinations of monitoring methods) adapted to a variety of uses and targeted services.



中文翻译:

适应功能生物多样性不同认知和使用的监测方法:来自欧洲定性研究的见解

功能性生物多样性在水果生产中促进自然调节和减少农药使用的作用得到普遍承认。尽管许多农民试图通过不同的策略(例如多样化的树篱、筑巢箱)来支持生物多样性,但他们往往缺乏评估他们的行为在实践中如何对功能性生物多样性做出贡献的手段。我们在此假设,要创建有用且适当的监测方法,有必要考虑有关功能生物多样性的知识、看法和兴趣的多样性。为了验证我们的假设,我们采用了基于对参与苹果园管理的农民、顾问和田间农艺师的访谈和研讨会的全面参与式方法。

我们的研究结果揭示了对功能生物多样性的多种看法以及监测方法的多种目标和用途。基于这些结果,我们确定了对功能性生物多样性管理的四种主要态度:观望态度、自然主义态度、监管态度和多功能态度。这些态度并不符合个人的概况,因为一个人可以对不同的生物多样性组成部分或支持生物多样性的不同做法采取不同的态度。此外,态度会随着时间的推移而变化。确定这些态度使我们能够与研讨会的参与者一起设计一个指导框架来创建监控程序(即

更新日期:2021-06-13
down
wechat
bug