Abstract South African tertiary institutions have supposedly been in a transitional state for decades. The country's universities profess the merits of the transformation occurring within their walls. Despite this purported embrace of decolonised scholarship, the reality is that there is great ambivalence towards it. The highly publicised reports of tensions and inequalities shatter the illusion of this intellectual utopia. Consequently, this article interrogates the major issues that are impeding this supposedly seamless transition to a decolonised higher education system. It presents the criticisms that are regularly raised by decolonisation advocates. Significantly, a notorious public dispute between two respected scholars is utilised as a case study. The incident illustrates institutional hypocrisy and validates the criticism levelled against South African universities. Essentially, the article's overarching objective is to highlight the discrepancy between the idyllic fantasy of a decolonised university and the reality being experienced by South African scholars.

中文翻译：

---

真与假转型：南非大学真正去殖民化障碍的讨论

摘要 几十年来，南非的高等教育机构一直处于过渡状态。该国的大学都承认在其城墙内发生的转变的优点。尽管这种所谓的非殖民化学术的拥抱，现实是对它存在很大的矛盾。有关紧张局势和不平等的广为宣传的报道打破了这种知识分子乌托邦的幻想。因此，本文探讨了阻碍这种向非殖民化高等教育系统无缝过渡的主要问题。它提出了非殖民化倡导者经常提出的批评。值得注意的是，两位受人尊敬的学者之间臭名昭著的公共纠纷被用作案例研究。这一事件说明了机构的虚伪，并证实了对南非大学的批评。从本质上讲，这篇文章的首要目标是强调一所非殖民化大学的田园诗般的幻想与南非学者所经历的现实之间的差异。