当前位置: X-MOL 学术Australian Journal of Public Administration › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Commonwealth place-based policies for addressing geographically concentrated disadvantage: A typology and critical analysis
Australian Journal of Public Administration ( IF 2.140 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-10 , DOI: 10.1111/1467-8500.12498
Aaron Hart 1, 2 , Julie Connolly 1, 3
Affiliation  

A suite of ‘place-based’ Commonwealth policy frameworks to address geographically concentrated socio-economic disadvantage foreground local knowledge and devolve some decisions to multi-government and local agent governance bodies. We analyse these policies with reference to Dewey's theory of democratic experimentalism, focussing on how publics are constituted in place and enrolled in processes of deliberation and problematisation, and on how policy success is framed. We categorise ‘place-based’ policies into three groups. Statutory collaboration policies enable coordinated intergovernmental investment in regional economic regeneration and enact broad publics through a concern with economic growth. Collective impact policies commission for social service integration and figure the users and providers of social services as their publics. Indigenous partnership policies are concerned with ‘self-reliance’, economic participation, and empowerment among Indigenous people. We find that only the policies in the latter type clearly provide their publics with epistemic or decision-making power. Further research on the implementation of collective impact policies would be necessary to determine their participatory scope, and statutory collaboration policies provide little opportunity for input from their publics. Our aim is to highlight the democratic significance of who is included in place-based deliberations and what is deemed to be valuable.

中文翻译:

解决地理集中劣势的英联邦基于地方的政策:类型学和批判性分析

一套“基于地方”的联邦政策框架旨在解决地理集中的社会经济劣势,突出当地知识,并将一些决策下放给多政府和当地代理治理机构。我们参考杜威的民主实验主义理论来分析这些政策,重点关注公众是如何在适当的位置构成的,如何参与审议和问题化的过程,以及如何构建政策成功的框架。我们将“基于地点”的政策分为三组。法定合作政策能够协调政府间对区域经济再生的投资,并通过关注经济增长来吸引广大公众。社会服务整合的集体影响政策委员会,将社会服务的用户和提供者视为他们的公众。土著伙伴关系政策关注土著人民的“自力更生”、经济参与和赋权。我们发现,只有后一种类型的政策清楚地为其公众提供了认知或决策权。有必要对集体影响政策的实施进行进一步研究,以确定其参与范围,而法定合作政策几乎没有提供公众参与的机会。我们的目标是强调谁被包括在基于地点的审议中以及什么被认为是有价值的民主意义。有必要对集体影响政策的实施进行进一步研究,以确定其参与范围,而法定合作政策几乎没有提供公众参与的机会。我们的目标是强调谁被包括在基于地点的审议中以及什么被认为是有价值的民主意义。有必要对集体影响政策的实施进行进一步研究,以确定其参与范围,而法定合作政策几乎没有提供公众参与的机会。我们的目标是强调谁被包括在基于地点的审议中以及什么被认为是有价值的民主意义。
更新日期:2021-06-10
down
wechat
bug