当前位置: X-MOL 学术Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of two strategies of reward-penalty mechanism for promoting net zero energy buildings
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments ( IF 8 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-11 , DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101347
Yuehong Lu , Zafar A. Khan , Hasan Gunduz , Changlong Wang , Muhammad Imran , Imran Qureshi

Due to reduction of feed in tariff, the exploration of design solutions for smart cost-effective energy system is required to enable the consumers to select the optimum capacity of renewable energy system. This study investigates an innovative reward-penalty mechanism which is specifically designed to promote net zero energy buildings and net zero energy communities. Two different strategies (i.e. the building-level-based strategy and the community-level-based strategy) are developed regarding the application of the proposed reward-penalty mechanism. The electricity loads of family-houses in Ireland ranging from 1,286 kWh/y to 36,802 kWh/y are used to study the effect of the proposed strategies. The results show that both strategies lead to a similar cost versus zero-energy-building level relationship, i.e. a higher profit is related to a higher zero-energy-building level whilst a heavier financial penalty is related to a lower zero-energy-building level. The difference between the costs for the entire community (100 family-houses) predicted by the two different strategies is observed to be less than 10%. The building-level-based strategy is observed to produce the change rate of cost versus zero-energy-building level curve that often deviates significantly from the expected parabolic curve designed in this study, thus the community-level-based strategy provides an advantage over the building-level-based strategy. In addition, the Monte Carlo sampling method is used to quantify the uncertainty of the proposed reward-penalty function.



中文翻译:

两种净零能耗建筑推广奖惩机制策略比较

由于上网电价的降低,需要探索具有成本效益的智能能源系统的设计解决方案,使消费者能够选择可再生能源系统的最佳容量。本研究调查了一种创新的奖励惩罚机制,该机制专门设计用于促进净零能耗建筑和净零能耗社区。两种不同的策略(即基于建筑物级别的策略和基于社区级别的策略)就建议的奖励惩罚机制的应用而制定。爱尔兰家庭住宅的电力负荷从 1,286 kWh/y 到 36,802 kWh/y 不等,用于研究拟议策略的效果。结果表明,两种策略都导致了类似的成本与零能耗建筑水平的关系,即 较高的利润与较高的零能耗建筑水平相关,而较重的罚款与较低的零能耗建筑水平相关。据观察,两种不同策略预测的整个社区(100 个家庭住宅)成本之间的差异小于 10%。观察到基于建筑水平的策略产生的成本变化率与零能耗建筑水平曲线通常显着偏离本研究设计的预期抛物线,因此基于社区水平的策略提供了优于基于建筑级别的策略。此外,蒙特卡罗采样方法用于量化所提出的奖励惩罚函数的不确定性。据观察,两种不同策略预测的整个社区(100 个家庭住宅)成本之间的差异小于 10%。观察到基于建筑水平的策略产生的成本变化率与零能耗建筑水平曲线通常显着偏离本研究设计的预期抛物线,因此基于社区水平的策略提供了优于基于建筑级别的策略。此外,蒙特卡罗采样方法用于量化所提出的奖励惩罚函数的不确定性。据观察,两种不同策略预测的整个社区(100 个家庭住宅)成本之间的差异小于 10%。观察到基于建筑水平的策略产生的成本变化率与零能耗建筑水平曲线通常显着偏离本研究中设计的预期抛物线,因此基于社区水平的策略提供了优于基于建筑级别的策略。此外,蒙特卡罗采样方法用于量化所提出的奖励惩罚函数的不确定性。观察到基于建筑水平的策略产生的成本变化率与零能耗建筑水平曲线通常显着偏离本研究设计的预期抛物线,因此基于社区水平的策略提供了优于基于建筑级别的策略。此外,蒙特卡罗采样方法用于量化所提出的奖励惩罚函数的不确定性。观察到基于建筑水平的策略产生的成本变化率与零能耗建筑水平曲线通常显着偏离本研究中设计的预期抛物线,因此基于社区水平的策略提供了优于基于建筑级别的策略。此外,蒙特卡罗采样方法用于量化所提出的奖励惩罚函数的不确定性。

更新日期:2021-06-11
down
wechat
bug