当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Hepato Biliary Pancreat. Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Head-to-head comparison between endoscopic ultrasound guided lumen apposing metal stent and plastic stents for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences ( IF 3 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-09 , DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1008
Edson Guzmán-Calderón 1, 2, 3 , Alfonso Chacaltana 1 , Ramiro Díaz 1 , Bruno Li 1 , Belen Martinez-Moreno 4 , José Ramón Aparicio 4
Affiliation  

Peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) result from acute or chronic pancreatic inflammation that suffers a rupture of its ducts. Currently, there exists three options for drainage or debridement of pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis (WON). The traditional procedure is drainage by placing double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS); lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) has a biflanged design with a wide lumen that avoids occlusion with necrotic tissue, which is more common with DPPS and reduces the possibility of migration. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses head-to-head, including only studies that compare the two main techniques to drainage of PFCs: LAMS vs DPPS.

中文翻译:

内镜超声引导管腔贴合金属支架和塑料支架治疗胰腺积液的头对头比较:系统评价和荟萃分析

胰周积液 (PFC) 由急性或慢性胰腺炎症引起,胰腺导管破裂。目前,胰腺假性囊肿和壁坏死(WON)的引流或清创存在三种选择。传统的做法是放置双猪尾塑料支架(DPPS)引流;内腔金属支架 (LAMS) 采用双法兰设计,内腔较宽,可避免坏死组织阻塞,这在 DPPS 中更为常见,并降低了迁移的可能性。我们进行了系统回顾和面对面的荟萃分析,仅包括比较两种主要技术与 PFC 引流的研究:LAMS 与 DPPS。
更新日期:2021-06-09
down
wechat
bug