Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals are at increased risk for experiencing sexual violence. Bystander intervention training programs are a first-line prevention recommendation for reducing sexual and dating violence on college campuses. Little is known regarding the extent to which SGM individuals are represented in the content of bystander intervention programs or are included in studies examining the effectiveness of bystander intervention programs. The present critical review aimed to fill this gap in knowledge. Twenty-eight empirical peer-reviewed evaluations of bystander intervention programs aimed at reducing dating violence or sexual assault on college campuses were examined. Three studies (10.7%) described including content representing SGM individuals in the program. Personal communication with study authors indicated that—although not mentioned in the publication—many programs describe rates of violence among SGM students. When describing the study sample, six studies (21.4%) indicated that transgender, nonbinary, or students classified as “other” were included in the research. Approximately two thirds of studies (67.9%) did not describe participants’ sexual orientation. No studies reported outcomes specifically among SGM individuals, and two (7.1%) mentioned a lack of SGM inclusion as a study limitation. Work is needed to better represent SGM individuals in the content of bystander intervention programs and ensure adequate representation of SGM individuals in studies examining the effectiveness of bystander intervention programs.

性和性别少数群体 (SGM) 的个人遭受性暴力的风险增加。旁观者干预培训计划是减少大学校园性暴力和约会暴力的一线预防建议。关于 SGM 个人在旁观者干预计划内容中的代表程度或被纳入检查旁观者干预计划有效性的研究的程度，知之甚少。目前的批判性审查旨在填补这一知识空白。对旨在减少大学校园约会暴力或性侵犯的旁观者干预计划进行了 28 项经同行评审的实证评估。三项研究 (10.7%) 描述了在程序中包含代表 SGM 个人的内容。与研究作者的个人交流表明——尽管在出版物中没有提及——许多项目描述了 SGM 学生中的暴力发生率。在描述研究样本时，六项研究 (21.4%) 表明跨性别者、非双性恋者或归类为“其他”的学生被纳入研究。大约三分之二的研究 (67.9%) 没有描述参与者的性取向。没有研究专门报告 SGM 个体的结果，有两项 (7.1%) 提到缺乏 SGM 纳入是研究的局限性。需要开展工作以在旁观者干预计划的内容中更好地代表 SGM 个人，并确保在检查旁观者干预计划有效性的研究中充分代表 SGM 个人。