The European Union (EU) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) have developed fundamentally different regional regimes to address human trafficking despite both drawing on the framework established by the U.N. Palermo Protocol. These regimes have been deployed to achieve different missions: crime control animates the European framework whereas migration management informs the ASEAN regime. These different regional agendas have led to all central elements of the respective antitrafficking regimes being addressed differently including, the legal authority of the regional regime over domestic legislation, the allocation of responsibility between “sending” and “receiving” countries, their approaches to subjects of human trafficking, and the connectedness of each antitrafficking instrument to the wider regional regimes. The two regional responses challenge general assumptions about the universality and coherence of the growing international legal framework on human trafficking.

中文翻译：

---

国际法和区域规范走私：欧盟和东盟如何重新定义全球人口贩运制度

尽管欧盟 (EU) 和东南亚国家联盟 (ASEAN) 都借鉴了联合国巴勒莫议定书建立的框架，但它们已经制定了根本不同的区域机制来解决人口贩运问题。这些制度已被部署以实现不同的任务：犯罪控制使欧洲框架充满活力，而移民管理则为东盟制度提供信息。这些不同的区域议程导致各自反贩运制度的所有核心要素得到不同的处理，包括区域制度对国内立法的法律权威、“发送”和“接收”国家之间的责任分配、它们对打击对象的处理方式。人口贩运，以及每个反贩运文书与更广泛的区域制度的联系。