ABSTRACT This article proposes an analytical framework for the understanding of aging in place, and asks: Which housing alternatives are compatible with aging in place? Who are responsible for providing housing in old age? A literature review demonstrates that there is no agreement on the “place” in aging in place, but that aging in place policies entail joint individual and public responsibility for housing. An empirical example demonstrates different policy expressions of aging in place at national and local government levels in Norway. The article questions whether a need to move to receive care is compatible with aging in place.

中文翻译：

---

在哪个地方老化？将就地老龄化与个人责任、住房市场和福利国家联系起来

摘要本文提出了一个理解就地老龄化的分析框架，并提出了以下问题：哪些住房替代方案与就地老龄化兼容？谁负责提供老年住房？一项文献综述表明，就地老龄化的“地方”没有达成一致意见，但就地老龄化政策需要个人和公共共同承担住房责任。一个实证例子展示了挪威国家和地方政府层面对老龄化的不同政策表述。这篇文章质疑搬家接受护理的需要是否与就地老龄化相容。