A budding area of research is devoted to studying evaluator curriculum, yet to date, it has focused exclusively on describing the content and emphasis of topics or competencies in university-based programs. This study aims to expand the foci of research efforts and investigates the extent to which evaluators agree on what competencies should guide the development and implementation of evaluator education. This study used the Delphi method with evaluators (n = 11) and included three rounds of online surveys and follow-up interviews between rounds. This article discusses on which competencies evaluators were able to reach consensus. Where consensus was not found, possible reasons are offered. Where consensus was found, the necessity of each competency at both the master’s and doctoral levels is described. Findings are situated in ongoing debates about what is unique about what novice evaluators need to know and be able to do and the purpose of evaluator education.

一个新兴的研究领域致力于研究评估课程，但迄今为止，它只专注于描述大学课程中主题或能力的内容和重点。本研究旨在扩大研究工作的重点，并调查评估者在何种程度上就应以何种能力指导评估者教育的发展和实施达成一致。本研究使用德尔菲法与评价者（n= 11) 并包括三轮在线调查和两轮之间的后续访谈。本文讨论了哪些能力评估人员能够达成共识。如果未达成共识，则提供可能的原因。在达成共识的地方，描述了硕士和博士级别的每种能力的必要性。调查结果位于持续辩论中，关于新手评估员需要知道什么和能够做什么的独特之处以及评估员教育的目的。