当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Community Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers?
Journal of Community Psychology ( IF 2.297 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-09 , DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22634
Ignacio Ramos-Vidal 1, 2 , Jorge Palacio 3 , Elsy Domínguez de la Ossa 4 , Ingrid Wehdking 3
Affiliation  

The Program for Psychosocial Care and Comprehensive Health for Victims serves, on a yearly basis, an average of 25,000 users in northern Colombia alone. The program is implemented by multidisciplinary teams comprised of psychologists, social workers, and community facilitators, who step in at the individual, family, and community levels. An attempt has been made to determine the effect generated by the timeframe through which professionals have been engaged with the program-filling positions of centrality and betweenness within the networks of information exchange and user referral, including the potential mediating effect from the structure of the egocentric network of implementers in the two aforementioned networks and the moderating effect of the sense of belonging to a team of professionals. Both centrality and betweenness are positional measures describing the location actors occupied within the network structure. Centrality reflects the nominations made and receipt by an actor in a network and is considered an individual indicator of prominence and power. Betweenness shows the times that an actor act as a bridge among two actors in a network and it is considered an indicator of strategic positioning in social networks. An egocentric network is the local structure of relationships that each implementer maintains with his or her direct contacts. In this study, 112 active implementers were included, mostly women (n = 97, 88.2%), who had been working on the program for 16.9 months on average (SD = 14.7). Through conditional process analysis, it has been shown that the time that the implementers have been working on the program and the sense of belonging to the task team are relevant factors that interact with each other toward explaining the level of centrality and betweenness of professionals in the information exchange and user referral networks.

中文翻译:

哪些因素可以解释项目实施者之间的信息交流和用户推荐?

仅在哥伦比亚北部,受害者心理社会关怀​​和综合健康计划每年就平均为 25,000 名用户提供服务。该计划由由心理学家、社会工作者和社区促进者组成的多学科团队实施,他们在个人、家庭和社区层面介入。已经尝试确定时间框架所产生的影响,通过该时间框架,专业人员参与信息交换和用户推荐网络中的中心性和中介性的程序填充位置,包括以自我为中心的结构的潜在中介效应上述两个网络中的实施者网络和专业团队归属感的调节作用。中心性和中介性都是描述在网络结构中占据的位置参与者的位置度量。中心性反映了网络中演员的提名和接受,被认为是突出和权力的个人指标。介数显示了一个演员充当网络中两个演员之间的桥梁的时间,它被认为是社交网络中战略定位的指标。以自我为中心的网络是每个实施者与其直接联系人保持的本地关系结构。在这项研究中,包括 112 名积极的实施者,大多数是女性(介数显示了一个演员充当网络中两个演员之间的桥梁的时间,它被认为是社交网络中战略定位的指标。以自我为中心的网络是每个实施者与其直接联系人保持的本地关系结构。在这项研究中,包括 112 名积极的实施者,大多数是女性(介数显示了一个演员充当网络中两个演员之间的桥梁的时间,它被认为是社交网络中战略定位的指标。以自我为中心的网络是每个实施者与其直接联系人保持的本地关系结构。在这项研究中,包括 112 名积极的实施者,大多数是女性(n  = 97, 88.2%),他们平均为该计划工作了 16.9 个月(SD  = 14.7)。通过条件过程分析表明,实施者在项目上工作的时间和对任务团队的归属感是相互影响的相关因素,可以解释专业人员在项目中的中心性和中介性水平。信息交换和用户推荐网络。
更新日期:2021-06-09
down
wechat
bug