A recurring set of questions in the multidisciplinary literature on interorganizational collaboration concerns the relationships between collaboration structures, processes, activities, and outcomes for the coalition as well the societal problem(s) the coalition seeks to address. These questions apply to counter-human trafficking coalitions as well. This mixed-method study helps address several gaps in extant scholarship via a comparative analysis of three nationally-scoped, counter-human trafficking coalitions comprised of nonprofit organizations operating in Global South countries. The key finding is that constructive leadership practices explain positive outcomes in ways that structures and activities do not. Implications are articulated for coalition leaders.

关于组织间协作的多学科文献中反复出现的一组问题涉及联盟的协作结构、流程、活动和结果之间的关系以及联盟寻求解决的社会问题。这些问题也适用于打击人口贩运联盟。这项混合方法研究通过对由在全球南方国家运营的非营利组织组成的三个全国范围内的反人口贩运联盟进行比较分析，有助于解决现有学术研究中的几个差距。主要发现是，建设性的领导实践以结构和活动没有的方式解释了积极的结果。对联盟领导人的影响是明确的。