This article has two aims. First, I offer a philological analysis of a key passage from Kant’s Logic : § 6. § 6 is widely regarded as the locus classicus for Kant’s theory of concept formation. However, I show that the part of this section that is most cited and discussed by scholars should not be attributed to Kant, as it is not corroborated by any of his Reflexionen . Second, I attempt to identify Jäsche’s source for this unsupported passage. Ultimately, I conclude that the unsupported passage in § 6 was based on a set of student notes that was similar to the Wiener and Warschauer logic notebooks. However, I also argue that it would be a mistake to regard this passage as the final or definitive statement of Kant’s views about concept formation.

中文翻译：

---

概念形成的三个康德式解释

这篇文章有两个目的。首先，我对康德的《逻辑》中的一个关键段落进行了语言学分析：第 6 节。第 6 节被广泛认为是康德概念形成理论的经典所在。然而，我表明，这一部分被学者引用和讨论最多的部分不应归因于康德，因为他的任何 Reflexionen 都没有证实这一点。其次，我试图确定 Jäsche 对这段没有支持的段落的出处。最终，我得出结论，第 6 节中不受支持的段落是基于一组类似于 Wiener 和 Warschauer 逻辑笔记本的学生笔记。然而，我也认为，将这段话视为康德关于概念形成的观点的最终或确定性陈述是错误的。