Populist-nationalist ideologies pose a threat to women’s rights. This article examines to what extent national institutionalisation of international frameworks promoting women’s rights can weather the misogynistic political climate accompanying the global rise of populist nationalism. The post-2016 situation in the Philippines offers a testing ground for this problem due to the co-existence of President Duterte’s hypermasculinist national leadership with a strong history of institutionalisation of the UN’s Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda. Drawing from an analysis of WPS policy and institutions in the Philippines between 2009 and 2019 and from field research and interviews with government agencies, local civil society organisations and international partners, this article argues that the WPS agenda will likely survive in the hostile environment. But it also finds that institutionalisation alone does not guarantee successful implementation. While the WPS agenda may ostensibly remain a national priority under populist-nationalist regimes, its progression has been halted.

民粹主义民族主义意识形态对妇女权利构成威胁。本文考察了促进妇女权利的国际框架的国家制度化在多大程度上能够抵御伴随全球民粹主义民族主义兴起的厌恶女性的政治气候。由于杜特尔特总统的超男子主义国家领导层与联合国妇女、和平与安全 (WPS) 议程制度化的悠久历史并存，菲律宾 2016 年后的局势为这个问题提供了试验场。根据对 2009 年至 2019 年菲律宾 WPS 政策和机构的分析，以及对政府机构、当地民间社会组织和国际合作伙伴的实地研究和访谈，本文认为 WPS 议程可能会在敌对环境中幸存下来。但它也发现，仅靠制度化并不能保证成功实施。虽然 WPS 议程表面上仍是民粹主义民族主义政权下的国家优先事项，但其进展已停止。