Psychoanalytic Dialogues ( IF 0.450 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-03 , DOI: 10.1080/10481885.2021.1902742 Shelley Nathans 1
ABSTRACT
My response aims to demonstrate how a capacity for triangular space allows us to tolerate and encompass differences of all sorts, ranging from theoretical orientations to family and coupling structures. I re-emphasize the contemporary Kleinian/Bionian Oedipus as a developmental model of the mind that is a departure from the classical model of the Oedipus complex and its associated anchoring in psychosexual development. I reargue the necessity of divorcing Oedipal theory from its historical heterosexist bias and highlight the clinical relevance of a contemporary Oedipal lens when working with a wide variety of non-heteronormative relationships, including, LGBTQ couples, families and single parents.
中文翻译:
关于俄狄浦斯镜头的进一步思考:回复评论
摘要
我的回答旨在展示三角形空间的容量如何让我们能够容忍和包容各种差异,从理论取向到家庭和耦合结构。我再次强调当代 Kleinian/Bionian Oedipus 作为一种心智发展模型,它与经典的 Oedipus 情结模型及其在性心理发展中的相关锚定不同。我重申将俄狄浦斯理论从其历史异性恋偏见中分离出来的必要性,并强调当代俄狄浦斯透镜在处理各种非异性恋关系时的临床相关性,包括 LGBTQ 夫妇、家庭和单亲父母。