Abstract:

This article analyzes the criminal procedure against the Schutzjudensohn (son of a protected Jew), Heyum Windmühl, who was charged with raping the six-year-old daughter of a Christian citizen in a case in Frankfurt am Main in the early nineteenth century. In doing so, it engages with three topics currently debated in historical scholarship: sexualized violence, the relationship between anti-Jewish resentment and gender, and marginalized masculinity and intersectionality. As this study posits, Christian criminal justice provides insight into the nature of contact and conflict between Jews and gentiles. The article illuminates the role discrimination played in the anti-Jewish-encoded criminal arena of sexuality and violence while also exploring the patriarchal gender order that shaped the misogynous construction of sexual assault in the case. Finally, it reveals how the mechanisms of criminal procedure, as well as the legal discourses of reform and regulatory interests impacted the verdict and its interpretation. This case evidences the impact of the motif of the "Jew as desecrator of virgins," the Jud Süß (Jew Süß) motif, which constructed Jewish men as rapists of Christian women.

摘要：

本文分析了针对Schutzjudensohn的刑事诉讼程序（受保护的犹太人的儿子），Heyum Windmühl，他被控在 19 世纪初在美因河畔法兰克福的一起案件中强奸一名基督徒公民的 6 岁女儿。在此过程中，它涉及当前历史学界争论的三个主题：性暴力、反犹太怨恨与性别之间的关系，以及边缘化的男子气概和交叉性。正如这项研究所假设的那样，基督教刑事司法提供了对犹太人和外邦人之间接触和冲突性质的洞察。文章阐明了歧视在反犹太编码的性和暴力犯罪领域中所扮演的角色，同时还探讨了塑造本案中性侵犯的厌女症结构的父权制性别秩序。最后，揭示了刑事诉讼的机制，以及改革和监管利益的法律话语影响了判决及其解释。这个案例证明了“犹太人是处女的亵渎者”主题的影响，Jud Süß (Jew Süß) 主题，将犹太男人塑造成强奸基督徒妇女的人。