当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Inf. Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A review on h-index and its alternative indices
Journal of Information Science ( IF 2.4 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-31 , DOI: 10.1177/01655515211014478
Anand Bihari 1 , Sudhakar Tripathi 2 , Akshay Deepak 3
Affiliation  

In recent years, several scientometrics and bibliometrics indicators were proposed to evaluate the scientific impact of individuals, institutions, colleges, universities and research teams. The h-index gives a breakthrough in the research community for assessing the scientific impact of an individual. It got a lot of attention due to its simplicity, and several other indicators were proposed to extend the properties of the h-index and to overcome its shortcomings. In this literature review, we have discussed the advantages and limitations of almost all scientometrics and bibliometrics indicators, which have been categorised into seven categories based on their properties: (1) complement of h-index, (2) based on total number of authors, (3) based on publication age, (4) combination of two indices, (5) based on excess citation count, (6) based on total publication count and (7) based on other variants. The primary objective of this article is to study all those indicators which have been proposed to evaluate the scientific impact of an individual researcher or a group of researchers.



中文翻译:

h指数及其替代指数综述

近年来,提出了若干科学计量学和文献计量学指标来评估个人、机构、学院、大学和研究团队的科学影响。h 指数在研究界为评估个人的科学影响提供了突破。由于其简单性,它得到了很多关注,并提出了其他几个指标来扩展 h 指数的属性并克服其缺点。在这篇文献综述中,我们讨论了几乎所有科学计量学和文献计量学指标的优点和局限性,根据它们的特性将它们分为七类:(1) h-index 的补充,(2) 基于作者总数, (3) 基于发表年限, (4) 两个指标的组合, (5) 基于超额引用计数,(6) 基于总发表数和 (7) 基于其他变体。本文的主要目的是研究所有被提议用于评估单个研究人员或一组研究人员的科学影响的指标。

更新日期:2021-06-01
down
wechat
bug