ABSTRACT

Unlike urban planning processes have actively used empirical approaches, the urban park design and planning still uses the conceptual research approach; therefore, discrepancies often arise between the designer’s intention and real phenomena. In this work, we examine and propose a trade-off method for sustainable urban park design and planning that integrates conceptual and connectivity analyses, specifically for the Yongsan Park master plan. Yongsan Park is a mega-scale urban park project with a unique history as being a military post-industrial site for a long time. To re-link the isolated park site to current urban context, the park connectivity requires careful consideration both conceptually and empirically during the design and planning process. We used the spatial network analysis and statistical methods to investigate the potential visitation proposed by the park master plan and to understand the correlations with built environment factors. The results indicate that an iterative process is needed between conceptual design ideas and empirical connectivity analyses to properly reflect the designers’ intent and improve the long-term outcomes of large urban park design and planning. The trade-off method also provides insights of the urban planning strategies for nearby neighborhoods to enhance park connectivity and potentially contribute to the park management phase.

摘要

与城市规划过程中积极使用经验方法不同，城市公园设计和规划仍然使用概念研究方法；因此，设计师的意图和实际现象之间经常会出现差异。在这项工作中，我们研究并提出了一种可持续城市公园设计和规划的权衡方法，该方法整合了概念和连通性分析，特别是龙山公园总体规划。龙山公园是一个具有独特历史的超大型城市公园项目，长期以来都是军事后工业基地。为了将孤立的公园场地重新连接到当前的城市环境，公园的连通性需要在设计和规划过程中从概念上和经验上进行仔细考虑。我们使用空间网络分析和统计方法来调查公园总体规划提出的潜在访问量，并了解与建成环境因素的相关性。结果表明，在概念设计思路和经验连通性分析之间需要一个迭代过程，以正确反映设计师的意图并改善大型城市公园设计和规划的长期成果。权衡方法还为附近社区的城市规划策略提供了见解，以增强公园的连通性并可能为公园管理阶段做出贡献。结果表明，在概念设计思路和经验连通性分析之间需要一个迭代过程，以正确反映设计师的意图并改善大型城市公园设计和规划的长期成果。权衡方法还为附近社区的城市规划策略提供了见解，以增强公园的连通性并可能为公园管理阶段做出贡献。结果表明，在概念设计思路和经验连通性分析之间需要一个迭代过程，以正确反映设计师的意图并改善大型城市公园设计和规划的长期成果。权衡方法还为附近社区的城市规划策略提供了见解，以增强公园的连通性并可能为公园管理阶段做出贡献。