This study explores ways in which diverse LGBTQI+ claim frames are sedimented in Greek everyday discourse. Specifically, it is interested in the identification of the argumentative resources that inform lay constructions of LGBTQI+ claims and rights, as well as of their potential social implications. The research data are drawn from seven focus groups, conducted in Thessaloniki, Greece and analysed by the conceptual tools of Critical Discursive Social Psychology. According to the analysis, liberal dilemmas over difference, visibility, and equality are mobilized. In particular, when accounting for violence and discriminations against LGBTQI+ community members, participants construct a normative hierarchy of exclusion, based on alleged differences between sexual and gender-related categories. Notably, in the context of arguing over different claim-making practices, participants prioritize the projection of uniformity – instead of difference – through non-provocative, consensual claiming actions. While liberal concepts and subsequent dilemmas inform these constructions, “liberalism” is also represented as the rhetorical other, when participants prioritize intersectional claims over (sexual and gender-related) identity politics. Finally, participants' discourse is informed by tensions between oriental and occidental ideological patterns. A juxtaposition between Western/European liberalism and Eastern backwardness is used to challenge homonormative perceptions, which are constructed as a means of de-radicalization.

中文翻译：

---

希腊非专业话语中 LGBTQI+ 权利和主张的构建：自由困境和性公民身份界限

本研究探讨了希腊日常话语中各种 LGBTQI+ 主张框架的沉淀方式。具体而言，它对确定为 LGBTQI+ 主张和权利的非专业结构及其潜在社会影响提供信息的论证资源感兴趣。研究数据来自七个焦点小组，在希腊塞萨洛尼基进行，并通过批判性话语社会心理学的概念工具进行分析。根据分析，关于差异、可见性和平等的自由主义困境被调动起来。特别是，在考虑针对 LGBTQI+ 社区成员的暴力和歧视时，参与者根据性和性别相关类别之间所谓的差异构建了一个规范的排斥等级。尤其，在争论不同的索赔做法的背景下，参与者通过非挑衅性、双方同意的索赔行动，优先考虑统一性而非差异性。虽然自由主义概念和随后的困境为这些结构提供了信息，但当参与者将交叉主张置于（性和性别相关的）身份政治之上时，“自由主义”也被表示为修辞上的他者。最后，参与者的话语受到东方和西方意识形态模式之间的紧张关系的影响。西方/欧洲自由主义和东方落后之间的并列被用来挑战同质化观念，这些观念被构建为去激进化的手段。双方同意的索赔行动。虽然自由主义概念和随后的困境为这些结构提供了信息，但当参与者将交叉主张置于（性和性别相关的）身份政治之上时，“自由主义”也被表示为修辞上的他者。最后，参与者的话语受到东方和西方意识形态模式之间的紧张关系的影响。西方/欧洲自由主义和东方落后之间的并列被用来挑战同质化观念，这些观念被构建为去激进化的手段。双方同意的索赔行动。虽然自由主义概念和随后的困境为这些结构提供了信息，但当参与者将交叉主张置于（性和性别相关的）身份政治之上时，“自由主义”也被表示为修辞上的他者。最后，参与者的话语受到东方和西方意识形态模式之间的紧张关系的影响。西方/欧洲自由主义和东方落后之间的并列被用来挑战同质化观念，这些观念被构建为去激进化的手段。东方和西方意识形态模式之间的紧张关系为话语提供了信息。西方/欧洲自由主义和东方落后之间的并列被用来挑战同质化观念，这些观念被构建为去激进化的手段。东方和西方意识形态模式之间的紧张关系为话语提供了信息。西方/欧洲自由主义和东方落后之间的并列被用来挑战同质化观念，这些观念被构建为去激进化的手段。