当前位置: X-MOL 学术Aerosol Sci. Technol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Quantification of cooking organic aerosol in the indoor environment using aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometers
Aerosol Science and Technology ( IF 5.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-14 , DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2021.1931013
Erin F. Katz 1, 2 , Hongyu Guo 3 , Pedro Campuzano-Jost 3 , Douglas A. Day 3 , Wyatt L. Brown 3 , Erin Boedicker 4 , Matson Pothier 4 , David M. Lunderberg 1, 2 , Sameer Patel 5 , Kanan Patel 6 , Patrick L. Hayes 7 , Anita Avery 8 , Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz 6 , Allen H. Goldstein 2, 9 , Marina E. Vance 5 , Delphine K. Farmer 4 , Jose L. Jimenez 3 , Peter F. DeCarlo 10
Affiliation  

Abstract

The Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) is used extensively to study the composition of non-refractory submicron aerosol composition during atmospheric field studies. During two recent studies of indoor environments, HOMEChem and ATHLETIC, the default ambient organic aerosol AMS quantification parameters resulted in a large discrepancy with co-located instruments while sampling cooking organic aerosol (COA). Instruments agreed within uncertainty estimates during all other sampling periods. Assuming a collection efficiency (CE) of unity, adjustments to the AMS relative ionization efficiency (RIE) were required to reach agreement with co-located instruments. The range of RIECOA observed (ATHLETIC: RIECOA = 4.26–4.96, HOMEChem: RIECOA = 4.70–6.50) was consistent with RIE measured in the laboratory for cooking-specific molecules. These results agree with prior AMS studies which have indicated that more oxidized outdoor ambient organic aerosol has a relatively constant RIE of 1.4 ± 0.3 while more reduced organics have higher RIE. The applicability of a higher RIE was considered for two ambient datasets, and agreement between the AMS and co-located instruments improved when an increased response factor (RIE × CE) was applied to positive matrix factorization-derived primary organic aerosol (POA). Based on the observations presented here and the literature, we recommend AMS users consider applying RIECOA=4.2 to source and indoor studies of COA and evaluate a higher POA response factor of the order of ∼1.5 in outdoor studies at urban background sites, and ∼2 at sites impacted by fresh sources. This study aims to improve AMS quantification methodology for reduced POA and highlights the importance of careful intercomparisons in field studies.



中文翻译:

使用 aerodyne 气溶胶质谱仪对室内环境中的烹饪有机气溶胶进行定量

摘要

Aerodyne 气溶胶质谱仪 (AMS) 广泛用于在大气场研究期间研究非耐火亚微米气溶胶成分的成分。在最近对室内环境 HOMEChem 和 ATHLETIC 的两项研究中,默认的环境有机气溶胶 AMS 量化参数导致在采样烹饪有机气溶胶 (COA) 时与位于同一地点的仪器存在很大差异。在所有其他采样期间,仪器在不确定性估计内达成一致。假设收集效率 ( CE ) 为 1,则需要调整 AMS 相对电离效率 ( RIE ) 才能与共置仪器达成一致。观察到的RIE COA范围(ATHLETIC:RIE COA = 4.26–4.96,HOMEChem:RIE COA  = 4.70–6.50)与实验室中针对烹饪特定分子测量的RIE一致。这些结果与先前的 AMS 研究一致,这些研究表明,更多氧化的室外环境有机气溶胶具有相对恒定的RIE,为 1.4 ± 0.3,而更多还原的有机物具有更高的RIE。考虑了两个环境数据集的更高RIE的适用性,当响应因子 ( RIE)增加时,AMS 和协同定位仪器之间的一致性得到改善 × CE ) 应用于正矩阵分解衍生的初级有机气溶胶 (POA)。根据此处提供的观察结果和文献,我们建议 AMS 用户考虑将RIE COA = 4.2应用于COA 的源和室内研究,并在城市背景站点的室外研究中评估更高的 POA 响应因子约为 1.5,并且 ∼ 2 在受新鲜来源影响的地点。本研究旨在改进 AMS 量化方法以减少 POA,并强调了实地研究中仔细比对的重要性。

更新日期:2021-06-14
down
wechat
bug