The propagation of de facto companies in the Organization for the Harmonization of Corporate Law in Africa’s (OHADA) Uniform Act on Company Law is so evident that it cannot be neglected. Some are permitted by the legislator (joint ventures) and others impose themselves (sociétés de fait and sociétés créées de faits). Contrary to other fields of law that reject factual situations, the OHADA Uniform Act on Company Law receives de facto companies and submits them to rules naturally meant for legal companies or legal entities. The purpose of this article is to determine the position of the OHADA Company Law with regard to the invasion of company law by de facto companies. A study of the Uniform Act on Company Law has revealed that de facto companies are recognized and treated as legal entities. We believe that the essence of this recognition is linked to the OHADA legislator’s desire to attain his or her objectives—namely, to secure business relations that can only be possible through the protection of the business, the interest of its partners, and even the interest of third parties.

中文翻译：

---

OHADA公司法和事实上的公司

在“公司法统一组织”（OHADA）《公司法统一法》中，事实上的公司的传播是如此明显，以至于不能忽视。有些是立法者允许的（合资企业），有些则是自己强加的（事实上的公司和事实上的公司））。与拒绝事实情况的其他法律领域相反，《 OHADA公司法统一法》接收事实上的公司，并将其服从自然适用于法人公司或法人实体的规则。本文的目的是确定OHADA公司法在事实上的公司对公司法的侵害中的立场。对《公司法统一法》的研究表明，事实上的公司被承认并被视为法人实体。我们认为，这种认可的本质与OHADA立法者实现其目标的愿望有关，即，只有通过保护企业，合作伙伴的利益乃至利益，才能确保建立业务关系。第三方。