当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Personality Assessment › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Assessing Maladaptive Personality in the Forensic Context: Development and Validation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Forensic Faceted Brief Form (PID-5-FFBF)
Journal of Personality Assessment ( IF 3.720 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-26 , DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1923522
Lisa M Niemeyer 1 , Michael P Grosz 1 , Johannes Zimmermann 2 , Mitja D Back 1
Affiliation  

Abstract

The current study proposes an adaptation of the PID-5 to assesses maladaptive personal traits in forensic settings. Specifically, we adapted the item set of the PID-5 Faceted Brief Form (PID-5-FBF) to the forensic context and validated the resulting PID-5 Forensic Faceted Brief Form (PID-5-FFBF) using self- and informant-reports of 199 male prisoners. Exploratory factor analyses suggested a four-factor solution comprising Antagonism, Detachment, Disinhibited Aggression, and Insecurity. Antagonism and Detachment were very similar to the domains with the same name from the five-factor solution of the PID-5. Insecurity conceptually resembled Negative Affectivity. Disinhibited Aggression represented a forensically highly relevant composition of Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Negative Affectivity. We report results for this four- and the canonical five-factor solution throughout the manuscript. The PID-5-FFBF domains showed convergent associations with the corresponding Big Five personality traits. Furthermore, the PID-5-FFBF domains were differentially correlated with indicators of psychological adjustment and forensically relevant outcomes such as institutional misbehavior and risk for reoffending. In particular, Insecurity was associated with lower levels of psychological adjustment, while Antagonism and Disinhibited Aggression were associated with higher levels of institutional misbehavior and risk for reoffending. These findings provide initial evidence for the validity and utility of the PID-5-FFBF in forensic settings.



中文翻译:

在法医背景下评估适应不良的人格:DSM-5 法医分面简要表 (PID-5-FFBF) 人格清单的开发和验证

摘要

目前的研究建议对 PID-5 进行改编,以评估法医环境中适应不良的个人特征。具体来说,我们将 PID-5 分面简要表 (PID-5-FBF) 的项目集调整到取证上下文,并使用自我和线人验证生成的 PID-5 取证分面简要表 (PID-5-FFBF) 199 名男性囚犯的报告。探索性因素分析提出了一个四因素解决方案,包括对抗、分离、去抑制攻击和不安全感。对抗和分离与 PID-5 的五因素解决方案中的同名域非常相似。不安全感在概念上类似于负面情感。去抑制的攻击性代表了对抗、去抑制和负情感的法医高度相关的组合。我们在整个手稿中报告了这个四因素和规范五因素解决方案的结果。PID-5-FFBF 域显示出与相应的大五人格特征的收敛关联。此外,PID-5-FFBF 域与心理调整指标和法医相关结果(如机构不当行为和重犯风险)存在差异相关性。特别是,不安全感与较低水平的心理调整有关,而对抗和不受抑制的攻击性与较高水平的制度不当行为和再犯罪风险相关。这些发现为 PID-5-FFBF 在法医环境中的有效性和实用性提供了初步证据。PID-5-FFBF 域显示出与相应的大五人格特征的收敛关联。此外,PID-5-FFBF 域与心理调整指标和法医相关结果(如机构不当行为和重犯风险)存在差异相关性。特别是,不安全感与较低水平的心理调整有关,而对抗和不受抑制的攻击性与较高水平的制度不当行为和再犯罪风险相关。这些发现为 PID-5-FFBF 在法医环境中的有效性和实用性提供了初步证据。PID-5-FFBF 域显示出与相应的大五人格特征的收敛关联。此外,PID-5-FFBF 域与心理调整指标和法医相关结果(如机构不当行为和重犯风险)存在差异相关性。特别是,不安全感与较低水平的心理调整有关,而对抗和不受抑制的攻击性与较高水平的制度不当行为和再犯罪风险相关。这些发现为 PID-5-FFBF 在法医环境中的有效性和实用性提供了初步证据。PID-5-FFBF 域与心理调整指标和法医相关结果(例如机构不当行为和重犯风险)存在差异相关性。特别是,不安全感与较低水平的心理调整有关,而对抗和不受抑制的攻击性与较高水平的制度不当行为和再犯罪风险相关。这些发现为 PID-5-FFBF 在法医环境中的有效性和实用性提供了初步证据。PID-5-FFBF 域与心理调整指标和法医相关结果(例如机构不当行为和重犯风险)存在差异相关性。特别是,不安全感与较低水平的心理调整有关,而对抗和不受抑制的攻击性与较高水平的制度不当行为和再犯罪风险相关。这些发现为 PID-5-FFBF 在法医环境中的有效性和实用性提供了初步证据。

更新日期:2021-05-26
down
wechat
bug