Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Understanding the data-sharing debate in the context of Aotearoa/New Zealand: a narrative review on the perspectives of funders, publishers/journals, researchers, participants and Māori collectives
Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online Pub Date : 2021-05-24 , DOI: 10.1080/1177083x.2021.1922465
Jane Reeves 1 , Gareth J. Treharne 1 , Reremoana Theodore (Ngāpuhi and Te Arawa) 2 , Will Edwards (Taranaki Iwi, Ngāruahine, Tāngahoe, Pakakohi, Ngāti 3 , Mihi Ratima (Whakatōhea and Ngāti Awa) 4 , Richie Poulton 5
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

This review outlines current debates about the sharing of research data, with a focus on relevance for Aotearoa/New Zealand. Recent years have seen increasingly frequent calls for public sharing of data from funders and publishers/journals in particular. Past research has suggested that researchers tend to agree that any detriments of data-sharing are outweighed by benefits for transparency and progress. We summarise trends across past research into perspectives of funders, publishers/journals, and researchers on data-sharing before raising three considerations. Firstly, past research on data-sharing has tended to overlook the potential implications of data-sharing for participants. We review the small body of research on participant perspectives. This research has conceptualised participants as a homogenous group without theorising how participants make sense of data-sharing. Secondly, perspectives on data-sharing vary depending on the methodology being applied, and we raise some specific considerations when data-sharing is proposed in long-term longitudinal research such as the Dunedin Study. Thirdly, Indigenous perspectives on data-sharing must be central to all research into data-sharing with any of the stakeholder groups, and we review existing research on data sovereignty in relation to data-sharing in Aotearoa/New Zealand and globally. We conclude by summarising a series of tensions between stakeholders in the data-sharing debate.



中文翻译:

理解新西兰/新西兰背景下的数据共享辩论:对资助者、出版商/期刊、研究人员、参与者和毛利人集体观点的叙述性评论

摘要

本综述概述了当前关于共享研究数据的辩论,重点是与 Aotearoa/新西兰的相关性。近年来,特别是资助者和出版商/期刊要求公开共享数据的呼声越来越高。过去的研究表明,研究人员倾向于同意,透明和进步的好处超过了数据共享的任何损害。在提出三个考虑因素之前,我们将过去研究的趋势总结为资助者、出版商/期刊和研究人员对数据共享的观点。首先,过去关于数据共享的研究往往忽略了数据共享对参与者的潜在影响。我们回顾了关于参与者观点的一小部分研究。这项研究将参与者概念化为一个同质的群体,而没有对参与者如何理解数据共享进行理论化。其次,数据共享的观点因所应用的方法而异,当在但尼丁研究等长期纵向研究中提出数据共享时,我们提出了一些具体的考虑因素。第三,土著对数据共享的观点必须是与任何利益相关者群体进行数据共享的所有研究的核心,我们审查了现有的与新西兰和新西兰和全球数据共享相关的数据主权研究。最后,我们总结了数据共享辩论中利益相关者之间的一系列紧张局势。当在但尼丁研究等长期纵向研究中提出数据共享时,我们提出了一些具体的考虑。第三,土著对数据共享的观点必须是与任何利益相关者群体进行数据共享的所有研究的核心,我们审查了现有的与新西兰和新西兰和全球数据共享相关的数据主权研究。最后,我们总结了数据共享辩论中利益相关者之间的一系列紧张局势。当在但尼丁研究等长期纵向研究中提出数据共享时,我们提出了一些具体的考虑。第三,土著对数据共享的观点必须是与任何利益相关者群体进行数据共享的所有研究的核心,我们审查了现有的与新西兰和新西兰和全球数据共享相关的数据主权研究。最后,我们总结了数据共享辩论中利益相关者之间的一系列紧张局势。

更新日期:2021-05-24
down
wechat
bug