This paper reviews and reinterprets the representation of the Kali Age Crisis as the reflection of feudalism, thus analyzing the feudalism debate. It substantiates the argument that the Kali Age Crisis did not represent feudalism. The apprehension of Brahmanas regarding the Kali Age did not emerge from political decentralization. It was the result of the competition from Jainism, particularly in south India. The Brahmanas were wary of the Jainas consuming a major share of the state patronage, thereby depriving the Brahmanas of the material resources, which they aimed to monopolize.

中文翻译：

---

作为耆那教与婆罗门教冲突的卡利时代危机：对印度封建主义辩论的贡献

本文将卡利时代危机的表现作为封建主义的反映进行回顾和重新诠释，从而分析封建主义的争论。它证实了卡利时代危机并不代表封建主义的论点。婆罗门对卡利时代的担忧并非源于政治分权。这是耆那教竞争的结果，尤其是在印度南部。婆罗门警惕耆那教徒消耗大部分国家赞助，从而剥夺婆罗门的物质资源，他们旨在垄断。