当前位置: X-MOL 学术The World Bank Economic Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
What We Learn about Girls’ Education from Interventions That Do Not Focus on Girls
The World Bank Economic Review ( IF 2.622 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-16 , DOI: 10.1093/wber/lhab007
David K Evans 1 , Fei Yuan 2
Affiliation  

What is the best way to improve access and learning outcomes for girls? This review brings together evidence from 267 educational interventions in 54 low- and middle-income countries – regardless of whether the interventions specifically target girls – and identifies their impacts on girls. To improve access and learning, general interventions deliver average gains for girls that are comparable to girl-targeted interventions. General interventions have similar impacts for girls as for boys. Taken together, these findings suggest that many educational gains for girls may be achieved through nontargeted programs. Many of the most effective interventions to improve access for girls relax household-level constraints (such as cash transfer programs), and many of the most effective interventions to improve learning for girls involve improving the pedagogy of teachers. Girl-targeted interventions may make the most sense when addressing constraints that are unique to, or most pronounced for, girls.

中文翻译:

我们从不关注女孩的干预中了解女孩教育

改善女孩入学机会和学习成果的最佳方式是什么?这篇综述汇集了来自 54 个低收入和中等收入国家的 267 项教育干预措施的证据——无论这些干预措施是否专门针对女孩——并确定了它们对女孩的影响。为了改善获取和学习,一般干预措施为女孩带来的平均收益与针对女孩的干预措施相当。一般干预措施对女孩和男孩的影响相似。综上所述,这些研究结果表明,女孩的许多教育收益可以通过非针对性的项目来实现。改善女孩获得机会的许多最有效的干预措施放松了家庭层面的限制(例如现金转移计划),改善女孩学习的许多最有效的干预措施都涉及改进教师的教学法。在解决女孩特有的或对女孩最明显的限制时,针对女孩的干预措施可能最有意义。
更新日期:2021-03-16
down
wechat
bug