当前位置: X-MOL 学术Land Use Policy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Differences in the effectiveness of land consolidation projects in various countries and their causes: Examples of Poland and Turkey
Land Use Policy ( IF 6.189 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-24 , DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105542
Jarosław Janus , Ela Ertunç

Land fragmentation is a primary cause of low agricultural profitability in many regions of the world. Adverse fragmentation parameters can be improved with land consolidation projects. Such projects are undertaken in areas characterised by different initial parameters of land fragmentation, types of agriculture, sociocultural conditions, and legislation that provides the framework for their formal and procedural implementation. All these aspects should affect not only the effectiveness of the projects but also how they are evaluated depending on the local circumstances. The paper presents results of the assessment of identified differences in land consolidation project effectiveness in the context of legal and sociocultural conditions. The research involved eight land consolidation projects carried out in Poland and Turkey. The countries have similar structures of agriculture and are conducting ongoing, long-term land consolidation schemes. The results are indicative of the necessity to differentiate assessment criteria depending on the location of a project and its primary goal. The application of popular land fragmentation indices could, in particular, lead to incorrect assessment of whether a project was successful when it was not intended to result in a significant increase in parcel area and reduction of the number of parcels. The research shows that it is possible to compare the effectiveness of projects from different countries provided that the process takes into consideration differences in local conditions affecting the development of agriculture and legislation.



中文翻译:

各国土地整理项目成效的差异及其原因:波兰和土耳其的例子

土地分割是世界许多地区农业盈利能力低下的主要原因。土地整理项目可以改善不利的破碎参数。这些项目是在土地分割,农业类型,社会文化条件和立法为其初始和程序实施提供框架的初始参数不同的地区进行的。所有这些方面不仅应影响项目的有效性,还应影响如何根据当地情况进行评估。本文介绍了在法律和社会文化条件下评估土地整理项目有效性差异的评估结果。该研究涉及在波兰和土耳其进行的八个土地整理项目。这些国家的农业结构相似,并且正在实施长期的土地整理计划。结果表明有必要根据项目的位置及其主要目标来区分评估标准。当不打算使包裹面积显着增加和包裹数量减少时,采用流行的土地碎片指数尤其会导致对项目是否成功的错误评估。研究表明,有可能比较来自不同国家的项目的有效性,前提是该过程要考虑到影响农业发展和立法的当地条件差异。结果表明有必要根据项目的位置及其主要目标来区分评估标准。当不打算使包裹面积显着增加和包裹数量减少时,使用流行的土地碎片指数尤其可能导致对项目是否成功的错误评估。研究表明,有可能比较来自不同国家的项目的有效性,前提是该过程要考虑到影响农业发展和立法的当地条件差异。结果表明有必要根据项目的位置及其主要目标来区分评估标准。当不打算使包裹面积显着增加和包裹数量减少时,采用流行的土地碎片指数尤其会导致对项目是否成功的错误评估。研究表明,有可能比较来自不同国家的项目的有效性,前提是该过程要考虑到影响农业发展和立法的当地条件差异。尤其是在不打算使包裹面积显着增加和包裹数量减少的情况下,导致对项目是否成功的错误评估。研究表明,有可能比较来自不同国家的项目的有效性,前提是该过程要考虑到影响农业发展和立法的当地条件差异。特别是,如果不打算使包裹面积显着增加和包裹数量减少,则可能导致对项目是否成功的错误评估。研究表明,有可能比较来自不同国家的项目的有效性,前提是该过程要考虑到影响农业发展和立法的当地条件差异。

更新日期:2021-05-25
down
wechat
bug