当前位置: X-MOL 学术The Journal of Academic Librarianship › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Characteristics of systematic reviews in the social sciences
The Journal of Academic Librarianship ( IF 1.953 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-21 , DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102396
Karen Chapman

As systematic reviews become more common in the social sciences journal literature, it is important for social science librarians to be familiar with this methodology. Knowledge of characteristics of systematic reviews that have been published in the journal literature can help to inform librarians as they guide researchers to adopt good practices. This paper analyzes a collection of 164 systematic reviews gleaned from the International Bibliography of Social Sciences database for the period 2017 to 2019 from journals in the fields of anthropology, business and economics, communications, education, political science, psychology, social sciences (comprehensive), and sociology. The methodology of each review was checked to answer questions about reporting of keywords and search terms, reporting of inclusion/exclusion criteria, time period searched, external guidelines referenced, initial number of studies retrieved and number of studies included in the review, and number and names of databases searched. Details are provided for the individual subject categories, and the implications of these findings for social science librarians are discussed.



中文翻译:

社会科学中系统评价的特征

随着系统评价在社会科学期刊文献中变得越来越普遍,对于社会科学图书馆员来说,熟悉这种方法很重要。期刊文献中已发表的有关系统评价的特征的知识可以帮助馆员指导研究人员采用良好做法。本文分析了国际社会科学参考书目收集的164篇系统评价的集合从人类学,商业与经济学,通讯,教育,政治学,心理学,社会科学(综合)和社会学领域的期刊中收集2017年至2019年期间的数据库。检查了每种评论的方法,以回答有关以下方面的问题:关键字和搜索词的报告,包含/排除标准的报告,搜索的时间段,参考的外部准则,检索到的初始研究数和评论中包括的研究数,以及搜索的数据库名称。提供了各个学科类别的详细信息,并讨论了这些发现对社会科学图书馆员的意义。

更新日期:2021-05-22
down
wechat
bug