A logical framework is presented to model legal interpretation and bring an appropriate construction of legal arguments. Reasoning with assumptions allows the construction of hypotheses. This is proposed in the context of legal procedures’ dynamics, where the framework evolves as part of the investigation prior to each trial instance. Two gender-biased legal cases from the Argentinian jurisprudence are analyzed in the light of the proposed theory. Afterward, some proof standards for civil law systems are discussed as a way to define a specialized dialectical argumentation semantics. We claim that the application of the proposed theory would bring software assistance for controlling the influence of external factors of the law in the investigation of a legal case.

中文翻译：

---

法律辩论中的事实调查和证明标准

提出了一个逻辑框架来为法律解释建模，并带来适当的法律论证建构。通过假设进行推理可以构建假设。这是在法律程序动态的背景下提出的，该框架是在每个审判实例之前作为调查的一部分而发展的。根据所提出的理论，分析了阿根廷判例中的两个性别偏见的法律案件。之后，讨论了一些民法体系的证明标准，作为定义专门的辩证论证语义的一种方式。我们声称，所提出理论的应用将为控制法律外部因素在调查法律案件中带来软件辅助。