当前位置: X-MOL 学术Circ. Arrhythmia Electrophys. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Correction to: Positive Clinical Benefit on Patient Care, Quality of Life, and Symptoms After Contact Force–Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Analyses From the PRECEPT Prospective Multicenter Study
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology ( IF 8.4 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-18 , DOI: 10.1161/hae.0000000000000076


In the article by Natale et al, “Positive Clinical Benefit on Patient Care, Quality of Life, and Symptoms After Contact Force–Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Analyses From the PRECEPT Prospective Multicenter Study,” which published online on December 8, 2020, and appeared in the January 2021 issue of the journal (Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2021;14:e008867. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008867), corrections are needed.


The authors have identified some errors in the references. Reference 15 (Maurer et al) should be deleted, and replaced by the current reference 16 (Tripathi et al). A new reference 16 is introduced:


Dorian P, Burk C, Mullin CM, Bubien R, Godejohn D, Reynolds MR, Lakkireddy DR, Wimmer AP, Bhandari A, Spertus J. Interpreting changes in quality of life in atrial fibrillation: how much change is meaningful? Am Heart J. 2013;166:381–387. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.015


On page 17, the citations in the following sentences are incorrect: “An improvement of ≈20 points (beyond the 5-point mimimum clinically important difference) in the total AFEQT score, as observed in the current study, has previously been shown to correlate with an improvement on the Patient Global Change assessment.15,16 In addition, the QOL improvement exceeded the minimum clinically important difference threshold corresponding to improvement in patients’ functional status by one European Heart Rhythm Association class.15


The citations should read, “An improvement of ≈20 points (beyond the 5-point mimimum clinically important difference) in the total AFEQT score, as observed in the current study, has previously been shown to correlate with an improvement on the Patient Global Change assessment.7,16 In addition, the QOL improvement exceeded the minimum clinically important difference threshold corresponding to improvement in patients’ functional status by one European Heart Rhythm Association class.7


The authors apologize for these errors.


These corrections have been made to the current online version of the article, which is available at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008867.



中文翻译:

校正至:持续性心房颤动中接触力引导的射频消融后对患者护理,生活质量和症状的积极临床益处:基于PRECEPT前瞻性多中心研究的分析

Natale等人在12月8日在线发表的文章“对持续性心房纤颤进行接触力引导的射频消融后,对患者护理,生活质量和症状的积极临床益处:分析”来自PRECEPT前瞻性多中心研究。 2020年,并出现在2021年1月的期刊(《循环:心律失常和电生理学》。2021; 14:e008867。DOI:10.1161 / CIRCEP.120.008867)中,需要进行更正。


作者在参考文献中发现了一些错误。参考文献15(Maurer等人)应删除,并用当前参考文献16(Tripathi等人)代替。引入了新的参考文献16:


Dorian P,Burk C,Mullin CM,Bubien R,Godejohn D,Reynolds MR,Lakkireddy DR,Wimmer AP,Bhandari A,SpertusJ。上午心脏杂志。2013; 166:381–387。doi:10.1016 / j.ahj.2013.04.015


在第17页上,以下句子中的引用是不正确的:“如本研究中所观察到的,以前的总AFEQT得分提高了≈20点(超过5点的最小临床重要差异)。对“患者全球变化”评估进行了改进。[15,16]此外,欧洲心律协会(European Heart Rhythm Association)的一类研究表明,生活质量的改善超过了最低临床重要差异阈值,该阈值与患者功能状况的改善相对应。15


引文应写为:“如本研究中所观察到的,以前的研究表明,总AFEQT得分提高了≈20分(超出了5分,对临床有重要意义的最小差异)。评估。7,16此外,QOL的改善超过了一项临床上重要的最小差异阈值,该阈值对应于一种欧洲心律协会对患者功能状态的改善。7


作者为这些错误表示歉意。


对本文的当前在线版本进行了更正,可从https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008867获得该文章。

更新日期:2021-05-19
down
wechat
bug