AERA Open ( IF 3.427 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-19 , DOI: 10.1177/23328584211008111 ChanMin Kim 1 , Brian R. Belland 1 , Afaf Baabdullah 1 , Eunseo Lee 1 , Emre Dinç 1 , Anna Y. Zhang 1
Tinkering is often viewed as arbitrary practice that should be avoided. However, tinkering can be performed as part of a sound reasoning process. In this ethnomethodological study, we investigated tinkering as a reasoning process that construes logical inferences. This is a new asset-based approach that can be applied in computer science education. We analyzed artifact-based interviews, video observations, reflections, and scaffolding entries from three pairs of early childhood teacher candidates to document how they engaged in reasoning while tinkering. Abductive reasoning observed during tinkering is discussed in detail.
中文翻译:
修修补补的推理的民族方法学研究
修补修补程序通常被视为应避免的任意做法。但是,可以将修补程序作为合理推理过程的一部分来执行。在这项民族方法学研究中,我们调查了修补程序作为解释逻辑推理的推理过程。这是一种可以在计算机科学教育中应用的基于资产的新方法。我们分析了来自三对幼儿教师候选人的基于人工制品的访谈,视频观察,反射和脚手架条目,以记录他们在修修补补时如何进行推理。详细讨论修补过程中观察到的归纳推理。