当前位置: X-MOL 学术Social Epistemology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Collaboration in Grant Proposals and Assessments in Ageing Research – Justification or a Quest for a Collaborology?
Social Epistemology ( IF 1.625 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-12 , DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2021.1913769
Sara Hultqvist 1 , Oskar Jonsson 2 , Håkan Jönson 1 , Susanne Iwarsson 2
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

Orientation towards application, transdisciplinarity and social distribution are prominent ideas when policy prescribes how to conduct research on complex, real-world issues. Issues dealt with in ageing research are both epistemologically complex and politically contentious. By using the metaphor of ‘travelling ideas,' we have followed these ideas on their journey into 17 approved grant proposals on ageing and their assessments in Sweden in 2016. We considered collaboration as the modus operandi of the implementation of the three ideas. Thus, we analyzed how plans for collaboration were described in the data. The result shows that although the ideas were clearly present in the policy documents, they were almost eviscerated in the majority of proposals and assessments. Only three out of 17 proposals reflected the ideas. Thus, collaboration as an aspect of research was not codified. As long as there is no established way of describing collaboration, researchers struggle to invent their own tentative versions, that is, a collaborology.



中文翻译:

老龄化研究中的赠款提案和评估中的合作——理由还是寻求合作?

摘要

面向应用、跨学科社会分配当政策规定如何对复杂的现实世界问题进行研究时,是突出的想法。老龄化研究中处理的问题在认识论上既复杂又在政治上有争议。通过使用“旅行想法”的比喻,我们在 2016 年在瑞典获得了 17 项关于老龄化及其评估的批准赠款提案的过程中遵循了这些想法。我们认为合作是实施这三个想法的方式。因此,我们分析了如何在数据中描述协作计划。结果表明,虽然这些想法在政策文件中清晰呈现,但在大多数提案和评估中几乎被掏空。17 份提案中只有 3 份反映了这些想法。因此,作为研究的一个方面的合作没有被编入法典。一种协作学

更新日期:2021-05-12
down
wechat
bug