The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has been called the ‘civil rights issue of our time’ (Holt & Sweitzer, 2020, Self and Identity, 19(, p. 16) but the All Lives Matter (ALM) movement swiftly emerged as an oppositional response to BLM. Prior research has investigated some predictors of support for ALM over BLM, but these predictors have thus far not included levels of racial bias or potentially relevant constructions of racism. This pre-registered, cross-sectional study (N = 287) tested the degree to which White participants’ support for ALM could be predicted using measures of racism (implicit and explicit) and ideological stances around the construction of ‘racism’ (that discourage the recognition of contemporary inequalities and discrimination). Using multiple regression analyses, we found that implicit racism, colour-blind ideology, and narrow definitional boundaries of discrimination positively predicted support for ALM over BLM. Explicit racism, collective narcissism, and right-wing political orientation did not predict ALM support, nor did any (2-way) interaction of these predictors. Implications for our understanding of the All Lives Matter movement are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

隐含的种族主义、色盲和狭隘的歧视定义：为什么一些白人更喜欢“所有生命都重要”而不是“黑人的生命重要”

Black Lives Matter (BLM) 运动被称为“我们这个时代的民权问题”（Holt & Sweitzer，2020，Self and Identity，19（，第 16 页），但 All Lives Matter (ALM) 运动迅速成为对 BLM 的反对反应。先前的研究已经调查了一些支持 ALM 而非 BLM 的预测因素，但这些预测因素迄今为止尚未包括种族偏见的水平或种族主义的潜在相关结构。这项预先注册的横断面研究 ( N = 287）测试了可以使用种族主义（隐性和显性）和围绕“种族主义”构建的意识形态立场（不鼓励承认当代不平等和歧视）的措施来预测白人参与者对 ALM 的支持的程度。使用多元回归分析，我们发现隐含的种族主义、色盲意识形态和狭隘的歧视定义边界积极预测对 ALM 的支持，而不是 BLM。明确的种族主义、集体自恋和右翼政治取向不能预测 ALM 支持，也不能预测这些预测因素的任何（2 向）相互作用。讨论了对我们理解所有生命问题运动的影响。