Catholic priests who sexually abused minors were transferred to other parishes without disclosing the actual reason for their transfer. Based on reports from Ireland, Germany, and the USA, and relying on Bourdieu’s concepts of field and habitus, this article demonstrates that first, the practices of denying and withholding information even to fellow priests are consequences of the repression of sexuality within the Catholic Church. The Church has not provided a legitimate language for priests to be able to engage openly about sexuality. Sexual repression as a field structure is incorporated into the priests’ habitus, resulting in self-censorship when it comes to articulating the issue of sexual abuse. Secondly, the article accounts for the change within the Catholic field and the priest’s habitus, which has resulted in the facility to verbally express sexual matters in order that the undisclosed practice of transferring abusive priests finally stopped.

对未成年人进行性虐待的天主教神父被转入其他教区，而未透露移交的真正原因。根据爱尔兰，德国和美国的报道，并依靠布迪厄的田野和习性概念，本文证明，首先，甚至拒绝向祭司提供和拒绝提供信息的做法是天主教会内部压制性行为的后果。 。教会没有为牧师提供公开使用性行为的合法语言。性压迫作为一种场域结构被并入了司铎的习性中，从而在表达性虐待问题时进行了自我审查。其次，文章说明了天主教领域和牧师的习性的变化，