当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. of Cardiovasc. Trans. Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Impella RP Versus Pharmacologic Vasoactive Treatment in Profound Cardiogenic Shock due to Right Ventricular Failure
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research ( IF 3.4 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-11 , DOI: 10.1007/s12265-021-10131-x
Jakob Josiassen 1 , Ole K L Helgestad 2 , Nanna L J Udesen 2 , Ann Banke 2 , Peter H Frederiksen 2 , Henrik Schmidt 3 , Lisette O Jensen 2 , Christian Hassager 1, 4 , Jacob E Møller 1, 2 , Hanne B Ravn 4, 5
Affiliation  

The aim was to translationally compare a pharmacologic strategy versus treatment with the Impella RP in profound RV cardiogenic shock (CS). The pigs were allocated to either vasoactive therapy with norepinephrine (0.10 μg/kg/min) for the first 30 min, supplemented by an infusion of milrinone (0.4 μg/kg/min) for additional 150 min, or treatment with the Impella RP device for 180 min. Total RV workload (Pressure-volume-area × heart rate*103(mmHg/min)) remained unaffected upon treatment with the Impella RP and increased in the vasoactive group (CS 179[147;228] to norepinephrine 268[247;306](p = 0.002 compared to Impella RP) and norepinephrine + milrinone 366[329;422] (p = 0.002 compared to Impella RP). A trend towards higher venous cerebral oxygen saturation was observed with norepinephrine than Impella RP (Impella RP 51[47;61]% vs norepinephrine 62[57;71]%; p = 0.07), which became significantly higher with the addition of milrinone (Impella RP 45[32;63]% vs norepinephrine + milrinone 73[66;81]%; p = 0.002). The Impella RP unloaded the failing RV. In contrast, vasoactive treatment led to enhanced cerebral venous oxygen saturation.



中文翻译:

Impella RP 与药物血管活性药物治疗右心室衰竭引起的重度心源性休克

目的是在深度 RV 心源性休克 (CS) 中比较药理学策略与 Impella RP 治疗。猪被分配到前 30 分钟用去甲肾上腺素 (0.10 μg/kg/min) 进行血管活性治疗,然后再输注米力农 (0.4 μg/kg/min) 150 分钟,或用 Impella RP 装置治疗180 分钟。总 RV 工作量(压力-体积-面积 × 心率*10 3 (mmHg/min))在 Impella RP 治疗后仍然不受影响,并且在血管活性组中增加(CS 179[147;228] 至去甲肾上腺素 268[247;306 ](与 Impella RP 相比p = 0.002)和去甲肾上腺素 + 米力农 366[329;422] ( p= 0.002 与 Impella RP 相比)。与 Impella RP 相比,去甲肾上腺素观察到静脉脑氧饱和度更高的趋势(Impella RP 51[47;61]% vs 去甲肾上腺素 62[57;71]%;p = 0.07),加入米力农后显着升高( Impella RP 45[32;63]% vs 去甲肾上腺素 + 米力农 73[66;81]%;p = 0.002)。Impella RP 卸载了故障的 RV。相比之下,血管活性药物治疗导致脑静脉血氧饱和度增加。

更新日期:2021-05-11
down
wechat
bug