当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Counseling Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Are work well-being variables distinct? A bifactor model of fulfilling work.
Journal of Counseling Psychology ( IF 5.088 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-06 , DOI: 10.1037/cou0000559
Blake A Allan 1 , Taewon Kim 1 , Tracie Y Liu 1 , Rhea L Owens 2
Affiliation  

The strengths-based inclusive theory of work and psychology of working theory propose that fulfilling work is a key outcome of the vocational intervention. Scholars have further argued that fulfilling work is the holistic experience of well-being in the workplace and can be assessed with meaningful work, work engagement, workplace positive emotions, and job satisfaction. This theoretical perspective suggests a bifactor model would best explain the relations among these variables, but this claim remains untested. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether a bifactor model best explained the relations among the four components of fulfilling work, in comparison to other plausible models. We also examined the concurrent and convergent validity of the fulfilling work construct, using other well-being variables, symptoms of distress, and contextual factor variables drawn from vocational theories. Supporting hypotheses, we found that a bifactor model best fit the data. We also found that fulfilling work positively related to eudaimonic work well-being, hedonic work well-being, and life satisfaction and negatively related to symptoms of distress. Finally, fulfilling work positively related to income and subjective social class. These findings offer conceptual and statistical implications of fulfilling work for research, counseling, organizations, and social advocacy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

工作幸福感变量是否与众不同?完成工作的双因素模型。

基于优点的工作包容性理论和工作理论的心理学认为,完成工作是职业干预的关键成果。学者们进一步认为,完成工作是工作场所幸福感的整体体验,可以通过有意义的工作,工作投入,工作场所的积极情绪和工作满意度来评估。这种理论观点表明,双因素模型将最好地解释这些变量之间的关系,但这一说法仍未经检验。因此,本研究的目的是调查双因素模型与其他可能的模型相比,是否能最好地解释完成工作的四个组成部分之间的关​​系。我们还使用其他幸福感变量,困扰症状,以及从职业理论中得出的上下文因素变量。支持假设,我们发现双因素模型最适合数据。我们还发现,完成工作与eudaimonic工作幸福感,享乐工作幸福感和生活满意度正相关,而与困扰症状负相关。最后,完成与收入和主观社会阶层正相关的工作。这些发现为完成研究,咨询,组织和社会倡导工作提供了概念和统计意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。与生活满意度和痛苦症状负相关。最后,完成与收入和主观社会阶层正相关的工作。这些发现为完成研究,咨询,组织和社会倡导工作提供了概念和统计意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。与生活满意度和痛苦症状负相关。最后,完成与收入和主观社会阶层正相关的工作。这些发现为完成研究,咨询,组织和社会倡导工作提供了概念和统计意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2021-05-06
down
wechat
bug