当前位置: X-MOL 学术Psychological Bulletin › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The comparative analysis of intelligence.
Psychological Bulletin ( IF 22.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-15 , DOI: 10.1037/bul0000306
Mary Flaim,Aaron P Blaisdell

The study of intelligence in humans has been ongoing for over 100 years, including the underlying structure, predictive validity, related cognitive measures, and source of differences. One of the key findings in intelligence research is the uniform positive correlations among cognitive tasks. This has been replicated with every cognitive test battery in humans. Nevertheless, many other aspects of intelligence research have revealed contradictory lines of evidence. Recently, cognitive test batteries have been developed for animals to examine similarities to humans in cognitive structure. The results are inconsistent, but there is evidence for some similarities. This article reviews the way intelligence and related cognitive abilities are assessed in humans and animals and suggests a different way of devising test batteries for maximizing between-species comparisons. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

智力的比较分析。

对人类智力的研究已经进行了100多年,包括其基本结构,预测效度,相关的认知措施以及差异的来源。智力研究的关键发现之一是认知任务之间的统一正相关。这已经在人类的每一个认知测试电池中得到了复制。然而,情报研究的许多其他方面揭示了矛盾的证据。近来,已经开发出用于动物的认知测试电池,以检查与人类在认知结构上的相似性。结果不一致,但是有证据表明存在某些相似之处。本文回顾了评估人类和动物的智力和相关认知能力的方式,并提出了设计测试电池以最大程度地进行种间比较的另一种方法。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2020-10-15
down
wechat
bug