OBJECTIVE Based on guiding principles such as parens patriae, juvenile probation officers (JPOs) not only supervise youth, but in certain jurisdictions they also decide how control-oriented their conditions will be. JPOs' perceptions of parenting could be related to their decision making. This study examined: (a) whether JPOs' perceptions of the home were associated with the conditions they placed on youth; (b) if JPOs' perceptions of the home aligned with the youths' perceptions; and (c) if JPOs' control-oriented conditions were associated with changes in parenting practices. HYPOTHESES (H1) JPOs' perceptions of the home should be positively related to youths' perceptions of parenting practices. (H2) JPOs' perceptions of the home should be positively associated with the conditions imposed. (H3) JPOs' control-oriented conditions may be positively associated with increased parental supervision, yet they may also be associated with lessened parental supervision. METHOD The sample consisted of 265 male youth (mean age = 15.41; 76.6% Latino, 19.25% White, 0.75% Black) who were arrested for the first time and placed on supervised diversion. RESULTS Latent class analyses indicated that there were three supervision conditions classes: standard, moderate, and high control. JPOs' perceptions of the home did not align with youths' perceptions of parenting practices (e.g., rule setting, curfew setting, and monitoring) yet they were the strongest predictor of receiving the most control-oriented conditions. Surprisingly, parental rule setting, curfew setting, and monitoring declined once youth were placed under supervision, and declines did not differ based on how control-oriented their official conditions were. CONCLUSIONS Parents are thought to be vital in justice-involved youths' success. Yet within this sample, officers' perceptions of the family did not align with youths' perceptions. Further, parental supervision declined equally regardless of how control-oriented youths' supervision conditions were. Parents must be better integrated into the process to enhance the success of youth on community supervision. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

合作伙伴还是对手？青少年分流监管与养育子女行为之间的关系。

目的基于缓刑法等指导原则，少年缓刑官（JPO）不仅监督青年，而且在某些辖区，他们还决定如何以控制为导向。初级专业人员的育儿观念可能与其决策有关。这项研究检查了：（a）初级专业官员对家庭的看法是否与他们对青年的条件有关；（b）初级专业人员的家庭观念是否与青年的观念相符；（c）初专干事的以控制为导向的条件是否与育儿行为的改变有关。假设（H1）初级专业官员对家庭的看法应与青少年对父母养育习惯的看法成正比。（H2）初级专业官员对住房的看法应与所施加的条件成正相关。（H3）JPO' 以控制为导向的状况可能与父母监护权的增加有正相关，但也可能与父母监护权的减少有关。方法该样本包括265名男性青年（平均年龄= 15.41；拉丁裔76.6％，白人19.25％，黑人0.75％），他们是第一次被捕并接受有监督的改道行动。结果潜在类别分析表明，存在三种监管条件类别：标准，中度和高度控制。初专干事对家庭的看法与青年人对养育习惯的看法（例如，规则制定，宵禁和监视）不符，但它们是接受控制性最强条件的最有力的预测者。令人惊讶的是，一旦将青少年置于监督之下，父母的规则制定，宵禁设置和监控就下降了，根据官方控制情况的不同，下降情况也没有不同。结论父母被认为对参与司法公正的年轻人的成功至关重要。然而在这个样本中，军官对家庭的看法与年轻人的看法不一致。此外，无论以控制为导向的青年人的监督条件如何，父母的监督都同样下降。父母必须更好地融入这一过程，以增强青年在社区监督方面的成功。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。父母的监督同样下降，无论以控制为导向的青年的监督状况如何。父母必须更好地融入这一过程，以增强青年在社区监督方面的成功。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。父母的监督同样下降，无论以控制为导向的青年的监督状况如何。父母必须更好地融入这一过程，以增强青年在社区监督方面的成功。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。